Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Indy Pendance
No, I was thinking more of a usage tax per call, per customer.

That's an attempt to ransom my peace and quiet: the bastards can call me unless I pay a Federal fee? I thought you were trying to avoid unnecessary Federal intervention...

295 posted on 11/11/2003 8:12:45 PM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski
Sorry, I'm not making myself clear. A tax on the user, a usage tax. You would be charged, for example, 3 cents per call, payable to the government, of course, automatically included in your phone bill, kind of like everything else.
299 posted on 11/11/2003 8:21:38 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski
I guess, my point was, if the government charged a tax per call, the telemarketers who called your home, or cell, or work, would be charged a per charge call, and likewise, regular households and businesses would be charged per their calls. If, the government opted to charge a per phone call tax, they'd never would have agreed to a do not call list, it would reduce their revenue. And I would be against that.
302 posted on 11/11/2003 8:24:58 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson