Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski
No, I was thinking more of a usage tax per call, per customer. The government would never agree to stop their flow of revenue by endorsing a do not call list in that instance. I'll bet it was suggested though. I don't think it would sway telemarketers from operating, it would be part of their normal operating costs, and would adjust that cost to the end user.
287 posted on 11/11/2003 7:58:21 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]


To: Indy Pendance
No, I was thinking more of a usage tax per call, per customer.

That's an attempt to ransom my peace and quiet: the bastards can call me unless I pay a Federal fee? I thought you were trying to avoid unnecessary Federal intervention...

295 posted on 11/11/2003 8:12:45 PM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson