Skip to comments.
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question
AP via Dow Jones
| 11/11/03
| AP Staff
Posted on 11/11/2003 9:08:02 AM PST by BunnySlippers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: BunnySlippers
Once again, RI's own local lefty rag doesn't carry this story.
Once again, I learn local news from FR before I learn it from any of our state-wide news outlets.
41
posted on
11/11/2003 9:44:49 AM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
To: Consort
Awesome. Thank you. I learn something new every day!
42
posted on
11/11/2003 9:45:54 AM PST
by
Prov3456
To: BunnySlippers; Doctor Raoul; Liz; LS; Howlin; Lazamataz; Sabertooth; William McKinley; remember; ...
But the obvious question isn't being asked of CNN by that AP reporter:
Did CNN give these staged questions to the candidates (or perhaps, just to *one* of the candidates) in advance?
43
posted on
11/11/2003 9:49:35 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: woofer
heck...it's just what I expected to hear
44
posted on
11/11/2003 9:51:37 AM PST
by
pointsal
To: BunnySlippers
To: Southack
Correctomundo! How can we trust any debate those losers run? They could be handing questions to candidates, the audience, sabotaging certain candidates make-up, screwing up audio, etc. etc.
CNN lost all credibility from me a long time ago, but I am delighted to see further evidence of their corruption.
To: BunnySlippers
Call CNN's viewer response number:
The local number is 404-827-0234
You can chose to speak to a real person or leave a message.
CNN does NOT have a toll free viewer response number.
47
posted on
11/11/2003 9:57:09 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
Comment #48 Removed by Moderator
To: BunnySlippers
Regrets only because they were outed.
To: Consort
GuruNet?
50
posted on
11/11/2003 10:09:07 AM PST
by
Humbug
(i haven't the foggiest idea what to type here)
To: BunnySlippers
Oh I get it, CNN thought that a debate about qualifications for what could be one of the next leaders of the free world, the most powerful country on the planet, should have lighthearted moments. F#$%ING GENIUS.
Was CNN also planning a little song and dance routine to lighten things up in between questions about National Security and the Economy?
Thank GOD none of those looney lefties will become our next President. Thank goodness for sources like FreeRepublic to keep us in the loop about stories that we wouldn't otherwise hear. CNN can enjoy it's continued decline in ratings and further damaged reputation.
To: BunnySlippers
Who is CNN kidding? The questions in these major debates are always scripted to a large degree.
52
posted on
11/11/2003 10:12:43 AM PST
by
jpl
To: BunnySlippers
When will they move to the "vast right wing pressured us" excuse? Didn't Amanpour already admit that CNN is "intimidated" by the Fox News Channel?
-PJ
To: Diddle E. Squat
"The real question is: Did CNN plant other questions, and has this producer done this before in other debates?"Do bears have hair and is the Pope Catholic?
54
posted on
11/11/2003 10:41:51 AM PST
by
SwinneySwitch
(Freedom isn't Free - Support the Troops & Vets!!)
To: BunnySlippers
I would have asked what the candidates thought about the RIAA and the downloading lawsuits. That would rock the vote.
55
posted on
11/11/2003 10:43:51 AM PST
by
js1138
To: BunnySlippers
I thought all the questions were planted by TV execs. It seems that would be the only explanation of the stupidity of most of the questions, like , "who would you want to party with?"
Sheesh, these candidates are laughingstocks all on their own, they don't need to add levity to the lightweights. They can barely keep their feet on the floor as it is.
56
posted on
11/11/2003 10:45:49 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
(ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
To: martin_fierro
What they regret is getting caught.
57
posted on
11/11/2003 10:46:11 AM PST
by
Spok
To: Consort
epicaricacyNot in my dictionary.
58
posted on
11/11/2003 10:50:34 AM PST
by
Grit
(No federal judicial nominee has been filibustered by a Senate minority in U.S.history)
To: Diddle E. Squat
That's what I was thinking too - how many other questions were planted?
To: BunnySlippers
Don't you mean the Communist News Network!!??
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson