Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats decry 'abuse' of civil rights [Dems condemn Treatment of al-Qaeda at Gitmo]
Washington Times ^ | Tuesday, November 11, 2003 | By Stephen Dinan

Posted on 11/10/2003 10:31:03 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:10:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Tuesday, November 11, 2003

Quote of the Day by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

1 posted on 11/10/2003 10:31:03 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Civil rights are only possessed by citizens. They are not at all the same thing as human rights. Typical democrat ignorance and misuse of terms.
2 posted on 11/10/2003 10:35:19 PM PST by Eärendil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
These people have NOTHING to run on. It's getting funny.
3 posted on 11/10/2003 10:37:20 PM PST by shteebo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shteebo
These people have NOTHING to run on. Even the recession is gone. Poor Dems...hehe
4 posted on 11/10/2003 10:41:57 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
These are foreign born enemy combatants.

The only time in US history when US Citizens were deprived of civil rights and civil liberties was during the liberal administration of FDR. A democrat.

See executive 0rder 9066 which intered 120,000 People in concentration camps many of whom were US Citizens.

It was the single largest forced migration in US History.


5 posted on 11/10/2003 10:45:21 PM PST by Kay Soze ('Tis safer in the Suni triangle than in liberally controlled Los Angeles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good. Everytime they speak on this issue they lose more votes.
6 posted on 11/10/2003 10:46:28 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The Democrats want to defend Al Qaeda terrorists' civil rights? I think a 9-11 commercial cut - a tasteful 30 seconds would be a fitting response to their ignorance.
7 posted on 11/10/2003 10:47:16 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
Everytime they speak on this issue they lose more votes.

Bingo. With this kind of rhetoric, Dems are driving swing voters away in droves.

8 posted on 11/10/2003 10:48:05 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Bump!
9 posted on 11/10/2003 10:49:19 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eärendil
An **excellent** point, and very well made!

Too bad the 'Rats refuse to acknowledge the difference, eh?

10 posted on 11/10/2003 10:57:52 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Er, not quite. Mr. Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and a number of other Constitutional civil rights during the War of Northern Aggression.
11 posted on 11/10/2003 10:59:20 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Not a gotdarn freekin peep out of these Aholes after Waco, Ruby Ridge, Richard Jewel and Bombing the S*it out of the Yugoslavia but they want to protect terrorists who want to blow us up!
12 posted on 11/10/2003 11:07:29 PM PST by america-rules (It's US or THEM so what part don't you understand ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Were they US or Confedrate citizens whose rights were removed?
13 posted on 11/10/2003 11:16:46 PM PST by Kay Soze ('Tis safer in the Suni triangle than in liberally controlled Los Angeles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eärendil
PURPOSEFUL misuse of terms. And .. all the while they are yelling and screeming that the President "misled" the American people .. and what's actually happening is the dems are "misleading" the American people.

Pretty much explains how the "projection" technique works.

This won't work. Diane Feinstein has already exposed the FACT the ACLU doesn't have any "actual" civil rights abuses to complain about. This thing is dead before it even gets started.

And .. if the dems continue to SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE TERRORISTS .. they are going to lose BIGGER than I thought in 2004.
14 posted on 11/10/2003 11:49:54 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Well, during the War, Mr. Lincoln's directives were hardly binding on the Confederacy, were they? Yep, it was U.S. citizens who had their civil rights suspended.
15 posted on 11/10/2003 11:53:20 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
[Dems condemn Treatment of al-Qaeda at Gitmo]

Why should this surprise anyone? Sometimes I think they are on the same side

16 posted on 11/10/2003 11:56:32 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Dems condemn Treatment of al-Qaeda at Gitmo

Put some ice on it.
17 posted on 11/11/2003 7:02:27 AM PST by Valin (We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"They attack the economy, they attack the war in Iraq, they attack the Patriot Act. In lieu of any positive agenda of their own, they're forced to attack. And apparently, this is the week they all come out and receive their talking points on the Patriot Act," she said.

You got it , Miss!

18 posted on 11/11/2003 7:05:28 AM PST by bullseye1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Mr. Daschle, South Dakota Democrat, said yesterday on NBC's "Today" that Republicans are pursuing a campaign against civil liberties "to bolster their standing in the polls, to bolster their political support around the country."

God, what an idiot!!! Yea, "pursuing a campaign against civil liberties" would be an enormousely popular way to get re-elected! Do these dip$hits even listen to themselves?

19 posted on 11/11/2003 7:10:10 AM PST by bullseye1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shteebo
The problems is we are SUPPOSED to have two major parties, what we have now is 1 1/2 major parties(at best) and this is not a good thing. The democrats will either get their act together and get some adults in charge or they will go the way of the whigs. What they haven't figured out yet is it's not 1973 and there are only 3.5 networks and one newspaper per town, with the raise of the internet, talk radio there monoply of information is smashed and people are starting to see that the emperor is buck naked.
20 posted on 11/11/2003 7:10:55 AM PST by Valin (We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson