Posted on 11/09/2003 4:16:32 PM PST by george wythe
Furious Royal mistress Camilla Parker Bowles last night slammed the "Charles-and-a-servant" scandal and insisted: "My prince would never do that."
Fighting back tears of rage, she dismissed the sleazy gossip as a "pack of vicious, evil lies" and added: "He would never stoop so low.
"Charles is a man of utter integrity and honesty. I trust him implicitly."
Camilla bitterly blamed Princess Diana's supporters for dragging up the claims made by a discredited former servant.
She told one confidante: "It's all so cruel and unfair. I know Charles better than anyone and there is not one iota of truth in this. How could there be?"
But stunned Camilla knows the public love royal gossip and fears people will think: "There's no smoke without fire."
The revelations broke while the 54-year-old prince was thousands of miles away on an official trip to India and the Gulf.And loyal Camilla, who has been phoning him several times a day, admitted he now sounds "miserable and adrift".
She revealed: "Charles told me all about this nonsense long, long ago. I dismissed it as the bitter ramblings of a disturbed alcoholic.
"But now it has come back to haunt us and his reputation is going to be dragged through the mire."
Camilla backed Charles's private secretary Sir Michael Peat for going on TV to denounce the prince's involvement in the "compromising" incident allegedly witnessed by former valet George Smith.
One of her friends told The People: "She thinks they couldn't just sit back and let the rumours build around the globe like a raging inferno. She knows the incident never happened.
"William and Harry know their father could never have done what is claimed. They say it is all complete fantasy.
"It is even more galling because Diana was behind the tape that started all this.
"When she recorded George Smith's claims, she knew she had a little bit of dynamite and could set it off in her husband's face whenever she needed too.
"Camilla realises Diana's most devoted supporters would love her to have the last laugh from beyond the grave. It's like a curse on her and Charles - andd she is horrified to think the public might actually believe these lies."
Charles himself gave permission for Sir Michael to make his official denial statement. He confided to courtiers at Clarence House that he felt "stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea".
And he told them: "I have nothing to fear about the rumour apart from the rumour itself."
One source said: "He thought it was pointless to pursue the tactic of burying your head in the sand in the hope it would go away.
"He felt going on the offensive was the only thing that could minimise the damage to his reputation.
"For all that has been claimed, Charles is still very keen to be King one day. A rumour like this could have completely destroyed his chances and he was not going to let that happen."
Senior royal staff at Clarence House agree that it is the biggest crisis the prince has had to face since Diana's death.
The British media has been banned by the High Court from disclosing details of the allegations.
Charles's ex-valet Michael Fawcett also originally gagged the Press from naming him.
But that injunction was lifted on Thursday after a newspaper said it had no intention of repeating claims about him.
Royal watchers and public relations advisers were split last night about whether the prince's tactic would be effective.
Royal author Ingrid Seward said: "It's quite unprecedented for his private secretary to come out and make a statement about something which we probably know about - but the great world at large don't really know what he's talking about.
"I don't think the allegation is something people would particularly want to hear."
I feel sorry for these people.
The Dick Cheneys of the world are in the position they are in because that is what they wanted to do of their own free will.
The Royals are in the position they are in because fate has cursed them with their lot.
These people are the descendents of foreign child-brides who were bundled off in the 17th, 18th and 19th Centuries to marry men they had never seen and who were often their first cousins in dynastic marriages arranged by their parents or by ministers while they were still children or infants. After marrying and procreating, their ancestors scattered their flesh and blood throughout Europe to marry other foreign cousins and repeat the cycle all over again.
Royalty is child abuse.
If Charles and Camilla had been commoners, they would have met, fallen in love, married and gone on to a long mariage or a divorce of their own free will.
As it was, Charles was married to a woman he barely knew for the sole reason that she was the only virgin of correct pedigree that Buckingham Palace could find to ensure that Charles produced "an heir and a spare".
Edward VIII did the right thing. Charles puts up with the Royal curse but it is clear that he hates it.
Please do. Gay + glue = An unforgettable night for the Emergency Room staff.
If she knew Charles was a bitter, disturbed alcoholic long ago one can only imagine what the missus knew about him.
If I were part of this dysfunctional family, I would be an alcoholic too.
What vibes do you get about Fawcett, the alleged rapist of two men?
Sources said the prince may sue George Smith, the former royal valet who claims to have seen an incident involving Charles and another male aide.The rumours about Charles cannot be repeated because of a court order obtained by former royal servant Michael Fawcett.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.