Skip to comments.
Sen. Feinstein urges Bush to renegotiate U.S.-Mexican Extradition Treaty
Associated Press ^
| 11-07-03
Posted on 11/07/2003 8:24:15 PM PST by Brian S
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:44:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Sen. Dianne Feinstein called Mexico a "safe haven for hard-core criminals" as she introduced a resolution Friday calling for President Bush to renegotiate the U.S.-Mexican Extradition Treaty to ensure that wanted suspects will not flee to Mexico to escape punishment.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Mexico
KEYWORDS: feinstein
1
posted on
11/07/2003 8:24:16 PM PST
by
Brian S
To: Brian S
Feinstein is not as hopeless as Boxer. Sometimes she does the right thing, as she seems to be doing here. Interesting to see if Bush takes her up on it. If I were Bush, however, I'd be curious to know if other Democrats will try to use it against him among Hispanic voters if he agrees.
2
posted on
11/07/2003 8:34:20 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Brian S
Did Arnold finally wake this old bitty up? Or is this just for show.
3
posted on
11/07/2003 8:34:24 PM PST
by
elbucko
To: Brian S
Maybe if we close our borders we won't have to worry so much about foreign nationals committing murder here and fleeing to Mexico....
4
posted on
11/07/2003 8:36:58 PM PST
by
freebilly
To: Cicero
Feinstein is not as hopeless as Boxer. Sometimes she does the right thingMy sentiments, too. I'd never vote for her, but this, school vouchers, etc, have caught my attention.
5
posted on
11/07/2003 9:01:45 PM PST
by
XHogPilot
To: Brian S
A 1980 extradition treaty that contains a clause exempting capital punishment cases. More recently, the Mexican Supreme Court ruled in October 2001 that life in prison is cruel and unusual punishment.This is insanity! We should not allow any Mexicans into the US until they begin extradition of those accused of capital crimes in the US.
6
posted on
11/07/2003 9:08:01 PM PST
by
XHogPilot
To: elbucko
No its not for show, and good for her. This is a result of a lot of murdering scumbags going back into Mexico and seeking refuge. The Mexican constitution allows that if you are given life in prison or the death penalty in the US, you can have haven in Mexico. This resulted from the Deputy David March case. (IMHO, Bush should have acted on this before Feinstein) since the March's have met Bush about this issue.
7
posted on
11/07/2003 9:27:43 PM PST
by
merry10
To: Brian S
wow ... Feinstein got one right
..... err ... go Feinstein (on this one thing only though)
8
posted on
11/07/2003 9:39:05 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
To: freebilly
I agree with you. We need to close the borders.
Quoting from a Mexican newspaper, "Mexico has the dubious honor of being one of the world's most dangerous countries."
Also, the article stated, "Just last year, 1.44 million felonies such as burglaries, rapes and assaults were reported, and 90% of them went UNPUNISHED."
Robbery is not what worries business executives in Mexico. Their prime concern throughout the country is kidnapping. Last year they had 437 kidnappings.
http://www.el-universal.com.mx/pls/impreso/noticia.html?id_nota=1677&tabla=miami
9
posted on
11/07/2003 10:12:44 PM PST
by
texastoo
To: Cicero
The death penalty is the law. Again, why do we change our laws for Mexico? Maybe only Americans will get the death penalty. Quite possibly we should wipe out the whole law and no death penalty for anyone. The end result of this would be that Fox and Mexico would drop their international lawsuit regarding our death penalty law. This Feinstien bill is nothing more than a win-win for Mexico and the U.N.
10
posted on
11/07/2003 10:40:18 PM PST
by
texastoo
To: elbucko
Feinstein is a moderate compared to Boxer.
Feinstein was on local tv news explaining how shocked we would be if we knew just how many terrorists cells have been identified in the USA and abroad.
She's a liberal, but she's a hawkish liberal on the War On Terror.
11
posted on
11/08/2003 12:27:05 AM PST
by
Susannah
(AMERICA is the best! - Could hundreds of millions of immigrants be wrong?)
To: merry10
No its not for show, and good for her.I beg to differ. I remember Feinstein doing a radio show with the talk show host, Michael Jackson, from a location on the US-Mexican Border about 3 years ago about the same issue. She talks a good game, but her words are hollow on all but abortion and gun control.
I' am very aware of the impediments to extradition the hypocritical Mexican constitution create. As far as I am concerned, Feinstein is as trustworthy as the Mexicans.
12
posted on
11/09/2003 6:05:10 PM PST
by
elbucko
To: Susannah
Feinstein is a moderate compared to Boxer.I disagree. Feinstein is every bit as radical as Boxer. She just doesn't show it. As a matter of fact, I consider Feinstein the more dangerous of the two CA female senators, for precisely the reason you cite. Feinstein "seems" moderate. Moderately on the left, that is.
13
posted on
11/09/2003 6:10:00 PM PST
by
elbucko
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson