Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
I'm just guessing there were laws on the books regarding the collection of tarrifs that were not being carried out.

Well, if the state seceded, it wouldn't owe tariffs, now would it? That was truly a weak rejoinder to what I stated, but I guess there really is nothing else you could say.

In any case, section 3 leaves it to the president's judgement.

And again, you as a lover of Constitution-mangling lefties like Clinton and Gore would certainly have no problem with a president practising dictatorial powers by mangling the meanings of words in the Militia Act.

274 posted on 11/10/2003 11:04:59 AM PST by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]


To: HenryLeeII
Well, if the state seceded, it wouldn't owe tariffs, now would it?

States never paid tarifs in any case. Individuals did. But there laws covering how the tarrifs would be collected.

President Lincoln's 4/15/61 proclamation said something like, "the laws failing of execution in several states..."

And yes, the law leaves it to the president's judgment.

Unilateral state secession is revolution.

Walt

275 posted on 11/10/2003 11:42:09 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson