Skip to comments.
The Facts About The Smoking Ban. If you're a business owner or not, this is a must read!
The Facts Online ^
| 11-01-03
| Dave Hitt
Posted on 11/06/2003 7:28:30 AM PST by SheLion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 441 next last
To: cinFLA
"Strange. I just called two of the restuarants you listed as closed and they are serving lunch! Hmmmmm"
Which ones?
101
posted on
11/06/2003 11:43:16 AM PST
by
CSM
(Moose Flatulence, MF for short is a bain on our future. Stop the MF today!!! (Flurry, 11/06/2003))
To: CSM
Now, what caused the number of available customers to decrease?The pool of available customers did NOT decrease.
102
posted on
11/06/2003 11:43:41 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA; Gabz; SheLion
"The pool of available customers did NOT decrease."
Prove it. Why would establishments that were in business for years, suddenly not be getting the revenues that they had been getting before the ban?
103
posted on
11/06/2003 11:47:11 AM PST
by
CSM
(Moose Flatulence, MF for short is a bain on our future. Stop the MF today!!! (Flurry, 11/06/2003))
To: cinFLA
"The pool of available customers did NOT decrease."
From the article:
-385 league bowlers quit when the smoking ban went into effect
-our business has dropped in the lounge from $1,000 a day to $80. "
-"From September to February, we lost close to $80,000 in sales"
-Sales dropped 50%.
-"We've lost 70 members because of the ban"
-90 percent of her customers were smokers.
-"I can count on my fingers the people who don't smoke who come in here. The regulars say they won't come."
Looks to me like the available market decreased.
104
posted on
11/06/2003 11:52:47 AM PST
by
CSM
(Moose Flatulence, MF for short is a bain on our future. Stop the MF today!!! (Flurry, 11/06/2003))
To: CSM
You really are a mental midget, which is typical of an anti freedom fighter! No, he just likes governmental interference in business, freedom and liberty. Sorta makes you wonder what he is doing on FR instead of Democratic Underground.
105
posted on
11/06/2003 12:03:31 PM PST
by
xrp
To: CSM
Are you saying that smokers no longer go out to eat?
To: jsbankston
Probably because their clientele were predominantly smokers who do not wish to go where they are forced to feel unwelcome.
107
posted on
11/06/2003 12:08:40 PM PST
by
Gabz
(Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
To: jsbankston
"Are you saying that smokers no longer go out to eat?"
Boy, denseness abounds. No, that is not what I am saying. I am saying that some smokers no longer go out to eat, some smokers still go out. I can garuntee that less money per capita is being spent, therefore less revenue available.
Take a group of regulars that would generally stop at a bar after work and hang out, play pool/darts/GT, have a few rounds and tip the bartender very well. Now, that group stops by for a couple (an hour vs. 3or4 hours) doesn't bother playing pool/darts/GT because they will have to go outside and leave the game unattended. Then when they leave they tip on about 25% of what they used to drink. Drink revenue is down, vending revenue is down, etc.
A per capita decrease in spending is has the same effect of a decrease in customers. I was using the word customers, so I wouldn't lose anyone having difficult with the concept.
108
posted on
11/06/2003 12:09:56 PM PST
by
CSM
(Moose Flatulence, MF for short is a bain on our future. Stop the MF today!!! (Flurry, 11/06/2003))
To: CSM
Totally unsubstantiated bs. I have already debunked some of their 'data' in a previous post.
109
posted on
11/06/2003 12:10:27 PM PST
by
cinFLA
To: xrp
I have often thought the same thing.
110
posted on
11/06/2003 12:10:35 PM PST
by
CSM
(Moose Flatulence, MF for short is a bain on our future. Stop the MF today!!! (Flurry, 11/06/2003))
To: cinFLA
No the smokers left because they no longer felt welcome.
These places are closing because the antis who promised a huge increase in business with smoking bans LIED.
111
posted on
11/06/2003 12:11:50 PM PST
by
Gabz
(Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
To: jsbankston
You got that right!!!! I live in Florida and have not patronized one restaurant since the ban went into effect on July 1,2003.
If restaurant owners don't care enough about there property rights then why should I support them??
Let you non-smokers who are now thrilled that you can breath clean air go twice as much!!!
To: MTR
Good for you,taking your money elsewhere is the way to go. Make sure you write a letter to the idiots in the state house and alert them to this fact.
113
posted on
11/06/2003 12:11:56 PM PST
by
Mears
To: cinFLA
"Totally unsubstantiated bs. I have already debunked some of their 'data' in a previous post."
Not until you tell us who you called. Until you come clean on who you called, you have not debunked anything. I would believe the article over your "claim" any day.
Now, who did you call?
114
posted on
11/06/2003 12:12:01 PM PST
by
CSM
(Moose Flatulence, MF for short is a bain on our future. Stop the MF today!!! (Flurry, 11/06/2003))
To: GWfan
Someone with good,common sense----Thanks,it's refreshing.
115
posted on
11/06/2003 12:19:29 PM PST
by
Mears
To: cherinfl
I'm going to all the ones where you used to go in Florida. Ah the clean air. Ah I can taste my food. I even left a better tip because my eyes didn't burn and my nose did not run in my food.
116
posted on
11/06/2003 12:25:26 PM PST
by
hotshot
To: cinFLA
Some of the worst hit places in Delaware, when it comes to restaurants, were those that had gone non-smoking on their own. Their market niche was taken away from them by the government.
If a place does a booming business with the same management and the quality of food and service for 20 years, bad food and bad management have nothing to do with why they are in financial trouble after a smoking ban. Stop being so silly and start being realistic.
The weather in Florida is vastly different that that of Delaware or other places in the northeast. Folks are not going to go where they don't like and why should they - it is their money they are spending.
117
posted on
11/06/2003 12:27:17 PM PST
by
Gabz
(Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
To: hotshot
"I'm going to all the ones where you used to go in Florida. Ah the clean air. Ah I can taste my food. I even left a better tip because my eyes didn't burn and my nose did not run in my food."
So you are punishing the business that used to cater to your preferences. You no longer reward the business that went out of their way to satisfy you. Sounds like you are a real loyal consumer. These business are probably really hurting now that you aren't spending all your lunch money at their place!
118
posted on
11/06/2003 12:30:07 PM PST
by
CSM
(Moose Flatulence, MF for short is a bain on our future. Stop the MF today!!! (Flurry, 11/06/2003))
To: Gabz
These places are closing because the antis who promised a huge increase in business with smoking bans LIED.I don't know that they lied; but they certainly did get it wrong. I think they just waaaaaay overestimated the number of people who stayed away from bars/restaurants because of the smoke.
119
posted on
11/06/2003 12:32:40 PM PST
by
kevao
(Fuques France!)
To: maryz
Making Mass non-smoking will not level the playing field for those establishments that are on the NH,RI,and VT border.CT also,but I think it has a ban.
Most of Southeastern and Central Mass is less than an hour away from Providence,a great restaurant city. A statewide ban in Mass will create a mess because Mass is geographically a small state and very easy to leave for an evening out.
120
posted on
11/06/2003 12:32:50 PM PST
by
Mears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 441 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson