Skip to comments.
Child Hands Out Heroin 'Candy' to Classmates
Yahoo News ^
| November 04 2003
| Reuters
Posted on 11/04/2003 9:51:56 AM PST by knighthawk
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - A five-year-old Dutch girl handed out "sweets" to classmates that turned out to be ecstasy, cocaine and heroin pills, police said on Monday.
The drugs were confiscated by a suspicious teacher before any were consumed at the primary school in Hilversum, southeast of Amsterdam. Police arrested the girl's older brothers aged 21, 19 and 16 and her 43-year-old mother.
Large quantities of soft drugs and hard drugs were found in the car of the eldest brother. The brothers were in custody, but their mother was set free after questioning.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: addiction; child; drugs; netherlands; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: Sloth
You are employing a logical fallacy Logical fallacies have been authorized for use in the War On Some Drugs.
41
posted on
11/04/2003 10:53:38 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: MrLeRoy
And no other pollster has ever gotten one wrong Yeah sooo? You were the one who cited Zogby as the word of God, IMO.
42
posted on
11/04/2003 10:55:45 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Dane
You were the one who cited Zogby as the word of GodWhat a stupid mischaracterization.
43
posted on
11/04/2003 10:58:50 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: MrLeRoy
"Nothing that violates nobody's rights should be prohibited."
Ah, I see. So even things under the influence of which people often do things that deprive people of their rights are okay by you. I get it.
44
posted on
11/04/2003 11:01:22 AM PST
by
MEGoody
To: MrLeRoy
"Nothing that violates nobody's rights should be prohibited."
Ah, I see. So even things under the influence of which people often do things that deprive people of their rights are okay by you. I get it.
45
posted on
11/04/2003 11:01:52 AM PST
by
MEGoody
To: MrLeRoy
Real nice. Drugs sold everywere. People are afraid to walk the streets at night. Junks, drug tourists and dealers who almost put it up your nose and those nice coffeeshops. Just imagine a nice coffeshop nextdoor, the fine clientel. Nice for small Dutch cities.
Strange how one Turkish family controls half of Venlo (they live a few streets from were I live in my village because no one with sense wants to live in Venlo anymore).
Legalization would make pot cheap and take away the criminal element and take away their profits. Strangely that didn't happen as promised.
But who cares, as long as the ordinary, honest citizens have to pay the price.
46
posted on
11/04/2003 11:01:52 AM PST
by
knighthawk
(Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
To: knighthawk
I don't need any 'actual arguments'. I just look around in cities like Venlo or Heerlen and see the results of legalization of drugs. And I don't like it Don't worry about LeRoy, KH. He is trying to tweek his usual FR Libertarian arguement of "cite the evidence of your claim", yada, yada, yada.
You could physically show LeRoy a drug haven, with people acting like animals, and LeRoy would say, IMO, "cite your evidence that drugs caused this".
47
posted on
11/04/2003 11:04:50 AM PST
by
Dane
To: knighthawk
Drugs sold everywere.What is the evidence that this is legal? The drug laws of the Netherlands are regularly misstated on FR.
48
posted on
11/04/2003 11:25:08 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: MEGoody
even things under the influence of which people often do things that deprive people of their rights are okay by you.Yes, I think alcohol should be legal ... other drugs, too. (Whether their use is "okay by me" is another question.)
49
posted on
11/04/2003 11:26:53 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: Dane
LeRoy would say, IMO, "cite your evidence that drugs caused this".And this would be an outrageous question to the WODdies, who apparently think ringing alarm clocks cause the sun to rise.
50
posted on
11/04/2003 11:27:58 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
51
posted on
11/04/2003 11:36:59 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
To: Dane
As if you don't have a usual argument.
Tune in next week for more antics from the FR WOD comedy team.
"I don't need any 'actual arguments'.....I don't like it."
Priceless.
52
posted on
11/04/2003 11:42:14 AM PST
by
KEVLAR
To: knighthawk
Ummmm...I don't know how to put this to you, but you do realize that the UN is one of the biggest supporters of our drug war, right?
53
posted on
11/04/2003 11:57:34 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
To: MrLeRoy
".......WODdies, who apparently think ringing alarm clocks cause the sun to rise."
Awesome statement!
54
posted on
11/04/2003 12:03:07 PM PST
by
CSM
(Shame on me for attacking an unarmed person, a smoke gnatzie!)
To: knighthawk
Come back when a majority of the people support it.I forgot that we lived in a Democracy, Kofi.
55
posted on
11/04/2003 12:05:07 PM PST
by
jmc813
(Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
To: knighthawk
We have had a ton of stories about children bringing guns to school. Some of these instances have resulted in actual deaths. I guess by the logic of the WOsD'ers we should prohibit members of our society from owning guns. By keeping them legal we are ensuring that the children will have access to them. Only by prohibition can we ensure that no guns end up on school property!
Of course that means scraping the constitution, that's ok, it's for the children!
56
posted on
11/04/2003 12:07:58 PM PST
by
CSM
(Shame on me for attacking an unarmed person, a smoke gnatzie!)
To: CSM
The vast majority of drug warriors on FR scoff at the concept of literal interperetation of the 2nd Amendment.
57
posted on
11/04/2003 12:24:03 PM PST
by
jmc813
(Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
To: knighthawk
Yeah dude, drugs should be free for everyone to use, even your children, heavy!Yeah, I see so many libertarians arguing that point here on FR </sarcasm>
Can you say, "Strawman?"
58
posted on
11/04/2003 12:25:57 PM PST
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: knighthawk
Yeah, nothing like this EVER happens in American schools.
59
posted on
11/04/2003 12:37:45 PM PST
by
Wolfie
To: knighthawk
What is the tax rate in your city and country? I would venture a high tax rate is driving the productive, casual users of substances away and leaving the dreggs that would suck off the government anyway!
60
posted on
11/04/2003 12:49:28 PM PST
by
CSM
(Shame on me for attacking an unarmed person, a smoke gnatzie!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson