Posted on 11/04/2003 4:58:06 AM PST by SheLion
BANGOR - A planned rally in opposition to a proposed Indian-backed $650 million resort casino in Maine was silenced by the shouts and protests of casino supporters Saturday in front of City Hall.What was supposed to be a public rally on the steps of City Hall featuring Maine Gov. John Baldacci (D) turned into a small press conference held inside a nearby office. As pro-casino representatives shouted "no more lies" and "yes for jobs," representatives from Casinos No! packed up their signs and left, to the delight of the pro-casino crowd.
"We're not into shouting matches," Janet Mills, a spokeswoman for Casinos No!, said during the press conference. "What we see outside is an example of desperate politics. They know the people of Maine have seen the light."
The latest polls suggest that opposition to Question 3 has reached nearly 60 percent heading into election day, when voters will decide whether to allow the Penobscot Nation and the Passamaquoddy Tribe to open a casino in Maine. The projected location for the resort casino is Sanford, in southern Maine.
Dennis Bailey, a spokesman for Casinos No!, said the decision to pull the plug on the rally stemmed from a fear that the safety of anti-casino representatives was at risk.
Despite Bailey's concerns, Sgt. James Owens from the Bangor Police Department said nobody from Casinos No! reported any threats of violence to the officers present at the rally. He also said both groups had permits to hold a rally at that time. No arrests were made.
"We respect their right to say what they have to say, but clearly they didn't respect ours. They were picking a fight," Bailey said. (ahhhhhhhh)
But casino supporters claimed victory after the anti-casino rally was canceled, and the cheers and shouts could be heard from protesters standing outside during the press conference. At a pro-casino rally held earlier in the day, Erin Lehane, spokeswoman for the political action committee Think About It, said casino supporters would continue their efforts until voters go to the polls tomorrow.
"The people are going to win this election. This is about putting people first. Nobody is standing up for the people of Maine. Nobody. We are not going to let the politicians and the millionaires take this opportunity away from the people in Maine," she said.
Supporters of the casino claim it will boost Maine's economy by providing good-paying jobs and $100 million in annual tax revenue to the state.
"Right now our families are working two part-time jobs, so the wage needs to go up," Vi Raymond, spokeswoman for the Maine American Federation of Labor, said during the pro-casino rally. "Labor unions make wages go up, and they bring in benefits and health care."
Debbie Kondilis, spokeswoman for the Penobscot Nation, said the casino would be good for everyone in Maine, not just the tribes.
"We need to put Maine back on the map," she said.
But opponents of the casino say it is not a quick fix to Maine's dwindling economy.
Maine humorist Tim Sample, who was part of the anti-casino press conference, said the proposed casino would ruin Maine's quality of life. (WHAT quality of life?!)
"A lot of people have been misled and have bought the line about jobs," he said. "Whatever the answers are [to Maine's economic problems], they're not simple answers."
Bailey, who calls the proposed casino a "bad deal for Maine," said he is not sure if Casinos No! will try to hold another rally in Bangor before Election Day.
He also said he was reluctant to bring Gov. Baldacci to a public rally because of safety concerns. (He's only 5'4". Wouldn't take much to take him down. heh)
"[The casino supporters] follow us everywhere we go," he said.
Also part of the press conference was former Passamaquoddy tribal Gov. Allen Sockabasin, who said he is opposed to a resort casino in Maine for cultural reasons. ??!!
"It goes against our grain. One of our values is not to take advantage of people," said Sockabasin, who presided over the Passamaquoddy Tribe from 1972 until 1976.
Those at the anti-casino press conference said they were not running away from a debate.
"We've always invited dialogue," Mills said. "This [Saturday's opposing rallies] is a shouting match - that's not what we're about."
"or are you just in high spirits and looking for anything, coherent or not, to post?"
snicker...snorfff...hee hee hee
how do you figure the 30-something Chad could be my son?
Chad is a very youthful 30-something.
Gosh, gray hair strands... are they the wiry kind, or the softer whitish kind?
I am cracking up MAJOR here!!
But.. but.. there are no gaming facilities here!
Now, will you PLEASE give the old lady a break? She just wants to have some fun before she dies, for heaven's sake! We must all remember, "Mama had a life before she had me." How true it is, for all mamas!
There are numerous federal programs for Indians only. 300 of them. More specifically, for Indians living on reservations. Most have little to do with treaty obligations. These should all be eliminated since tribes claim they are sovereign nations. Which are worth more to the tribes? Which do they prefer? The Federal social welfare programs, or casinos and nearly tax free gasoline, tobacco sales?
Source please. I'd like to see this list of 300 federal programs that only indians are eligible to receive, to the exclusion of all others. Thanks in advance.
More specifically, for Indians living on reservations. Most have little to do with treaty obligations. These should all be eliminated since tribes claim they are sovereign nations.
Ahhh... here's where your mistake is - it has long been established that while "sovereign", reservations are considered "Dependent Nations" per case law, and the acts of congress that have slowly whittled away a lot of the sovereignty.
Which are worth more to the tribes? Which do they prefer? The Federal social welfare programs, or casinos and nearly tax free gasoline, tobacco sales?
Hmmm... By "nearly tax-free", of course, you mean they pay lower taxes than you, and you are extremely jealous because you get shafted by your government, and the indians don't.
Personally, I (and most indians I know) am against 99% of the "federal assistance" programs, whether they are for indians or non-indians, and I would rather fight to lower taxes for everyone instead of demanding that others pay MORE.
Wouldn't it be something if the "white" (used loosely to mean non-indian) governments stopped interfering with economic development, and lowered taxes? Apparently to you, that is not an option. You'd rather the tribal governments raised their tax rates, rather than everyone else cut theirs.
That makes you pro-tax increase, my friend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.