Nope, none of those three links gives the official position of the Catholic Church. You published the opinions of lay Catholics, not the Church. There's a big difference. If I start posting Jews for Jesus links does it follow that Judism holds Christ as the Son Of God? Of course not.
The reason I am contending this minor point is because the Church is quite clear on the fact that the only Voice of Jesus is in the Gospel. So the fact that you are so adamant serves to highlight your ignorance on matters of Catholicism.
Others have debunked your theories about the Pope Pious, including Jews who were there and who were much smarter than you are. I am only continuing this thread to point out what an ass you are. Rather than just admit you are wrong and let it go (we Catholics are big on forgivness BTW -it's our strong suit) you continue to try to fight your way out of this paper bag with your hands tied behind your back. Popes don't speak for God. He speaks for himself. To all of us.
Oh, indeed. Who has debunked my "theory" that PIUS XII was the architect of the protocols, and adhered to them?
Let us review. "Voice of Jesus" is a shorthand for Papal Infallibility, which IS a doctrine of the catholic church, and is, as I have stated, only invoked upon cathedral pronouncements of grave formal presentment. You are once again caviling at irrelevancies because you prefer that to answering the central charges. I have demonstrated the common use of the term, do I really need to do your homework for you on the subject Papal Infallibility? Enough with this BS, pony up an argument or a fact or two, I'm a little tired of being your google fetchit boy.