You keep using that term. Can you cite Catholic dogma calling the Vatican the "Voice of Jesus?"
Utterly irrelevant.
Completely relevant. Unless you can tell us what the Church could have done to change the course of the Holocaust (aside, of course, from the millions of lives that were save through direct action by the Chruch that is) there is absolutely no point in us having this conversation (unless this is about some special need you have for making your self look ignorant and bigotted).
So, are you just paying no attention? He could have honored the previous Pope's interrupted encyclical against church expressions of anti-jewish sentiment. He could have deep-sixed the Accords, and spoken out with the official voice of jesus against the ovens, any time between 1939 and xmas, 1942. He could have ex-communicated anyone working on the "jewish problem". He could have ordered the churches birth and marriage records sent off to an Abbey in Timbucktoo, rather than neatly collated and turned over to the SS. He could have refused the german army his priests. He could have excommunicated the Slovokian church heirarchy...and the list goes on and on and on.
The Nazis renounced Catholicism and even persecuted it where it wanted to. None of these actions would have made one bit of difference.
This comes up quite a lot in birth control discussions, and evolution discussions. When the Pope produces a serious document, like an encyclical, or a Bull of Excommunication, he is speaking with the Voice of Jesus, and establishing church policy. When he speaks ex cathedra, he is not. See the Catholic Encyclopedia if you need more details.
Of course they did nothing of the sort, has the Hitler speeches I have quoted to you make perfectly clear. Hitler was born Catholic, and died catholic. He did not at any point renounce the church, nor the church him.
None of these actions would have made one bit of difference.
That is, of course, obviously not true.