Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
I never had any doubt that Oswald did it, and that he acted alone. Of course, now that ABC and Peter Jennings are saying that, I might have to reconsider.
4 posted on 11/01/2003 12:02:48 PM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TruthShallSetYouFree
now that ABC and Peter Jennings are saying that, I might have to reconsider.

Yup, this investigation is agenda-ized, if Jennings, ABC and liberal media are involved. Whatever their agenda may be. We know that every thing liberal media reports is based on the furtherance of their agenda.

(I don't know how Jennings can repudiate the historian-of-record on the assassination, Oliver Stone. I thought libs wanted it to be a cross-dressed J.E. Hoover and right-wing Cubans opposed to the enlightened reign of Castro.)

What we DO know about how the leftist media reports and does "investigations": They start with their conclusion and then miraculously the evidence supports their theory. (Which is how universities and science work today.)

Motto of post-modernism (media, business, academia):

If the data don't support the theory, change the data.

20 posted on 11/01/2003 12:15:46 PM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
This is nonsense. Oswald had atleast 7 other accomplices, three of whon were in Dealey Plaza, one of whom is actually visibly armed in the Zapruder film. Two others in the crowd used various motions (including opening an unbrella) to help Lee and the other assassin time their shots. At least 3 other accomplices were in various parts of Dallas at the time, and one was in Cuba. Oswald's gun dealer was on the phone with John Foster Dulles at the same time, while the Pentagon was getting ready to cut off all radio communication on cue from one of the assassins. The Sydney Morning Herald on that morning was in the process of tysetting the lead story of the assassination hours before it happened.

And they tell us Oswald acted alone.

HAH!!



/sarcasm

25 posted on 11/01/2003 12:18:44 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
I have a beautiful bridge in downtown Tombsdtone you can buy cheap.
31 posted on 11/01/2003 12:23:34 PM PST by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Well, Oliver Stone was the beloved of Hollywood. They touted him, held him up, awarded him and loved him. Then he made JFK and you would think he was the craziest man who ever lived. They examined his life, criticized him, made fun of him, called him names.

Why? Because the movie JFK said something that the liberals wanted to dismiss as ridiculous and that required "shooting" the messenger. At least thats my guess. From the most beloved of the elite to the most hated. Mysterious.
119 posted on 11/01/2003 2:53:12 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson