Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Gay' bishop-elect draws Prince Charles into Church row -
The Telegraph - UK ^ | November 1, 2003 | Jonathan Petre

Posted on 10/31/2003 7:49:52 PM PST by UnklGene

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: DLfromthedesert
So he's comparing the prince's lifelong love for this woman to his faggotry?

You got it! It helps soothe his seared conscious to highlight in neon lights the sins of everyone else. It helps him mask the fact that he left his wife and children in order to have filthy anal sex with a man.

21 posted on 10/31/2003 9:07:11 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

God has no need to judge a thing twice.

22 posted on 10/31/2003 9:09:56 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
What part of abomination did he not get?
23 posted on 10/31/2003 10:00:41 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38
#18, which Queen are you referring to, the Bishop elect, or Elizabeth?
24 posted on 10/31/2003 10:18:17 PM PST by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
The real one...


25 posted on 11/01/2003 12:06:37 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
How very tacky by the King of Tacky.
26 posted on 11/01/2003 6:19:22 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GretchenEE
Me, too, but I never got to see the whole thing. Wonder if it's available on tape or DVD?
27 posted on 11/01/2003 6:20:54 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
We've reinterpreted passages about slavery and the role of women,"

I hate it when they twist things around like that. Slavery is NOT encouraged by the Bible. Slave owners are encouraged to free their slaves even in the OT, which was completely opposite to any of the beliefs in the year 1000BC. Women are NOT belittled, Miriam was held in high respect and there are the heroines Jael, Deborah, Esther, etc. etc. Makes you think these guys are more similar to the Nutzis. After all, Goebbels said: "If you tell a lie over and over again, people think it's the truth"
28 posted on 11/01/2003 6:23:44 AM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ahadams2
oh crud vicki gene just involved invoked the House of Windsor Ping!

Getting desperate, it would seem.

29 posted on 11/01/2003 6:37:21 AM PST by Eala (FR Traditional Anglican Directory: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity
Frankly, I am so tired of hearing that word "process" - I just want something to HAPPEN - some DECISION to be made, and the Orthodox Episcopalians here in America, be given a place to stand, a place that is most definitely not part of the apostate ECUSA.

It's going to happen and quite soon, I suspect.

As a child of the 60's, I believed in staying in, fighting from within, rather than leaving and trying to picket them, (whoever the "them" of the time was). But dang it, I'm getting the idea that it's time to leave. I've begun to realize that by staying, I am de facto countenancing what ECUSA is doing, even though the Church I belong to here in No. VA, and the other 4 I've belonged to, are not part of this heresy.

You are fortunate; for now I'd stay where you are. Would you recommend these churches to those in your area looking to leave churches that are part of the heresy?

30 posted on 11/01/2003 6:44:08 AM PST by Eala (FR Traditional Anglican Directory: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
"Sodom and Gomorrah is about homosexual rape. St Paul is talking about idolators," he said, incorrectly.

The sodomite bishop is reaching for a lower common denominator by implying that two wrongs make a right - which they do not. Just because the(?!) chuch changes it's understanding of anything doesn't necessarily mean that it's correct. This man is the straw that's going to break the Anglican organization in two. He is not concerned with being a bishop, Christianity, or in repenting towards Christ; he is concerned with himself.
31 posted on 11/01/2003 6:45:09 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: MissouriForBush; GretchenEE
I, too, am a former Episcopalian who left the church long ago. The Episcopal Church of the past several decades in no way, shape or form resembles the church of my childhood. Way back when they "revised" (or desecrated) the hymnal and prayer book was the beginning of the end for me.

There seem to be a few of us here. I rode through the prayer-book changes admittedly fairly unawares; it was the shock of going to a diocesan convention in '82 and seeing the naked effort by the liberals to hijack the church for political ends that was my wake-up call. By '83 I came to understand just how much the church had changed, and I found a new home in an APCK parish.

33 posted on 11/01/2003 6:51:30 AM PST by Eala (FR Traditional Anglican Directory: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay; ahadams2
This man is the straw that's going to break the Anglican organization in two.

I think he's more than just a straw, but it also seems to me the tensions across the Anglican Communion have likely been rather greater than usual ever since ECUSA started running off to do its own thing. I will be surprised if his, um, "elevation" tomorrow (T minus 30 hours) isn't the trigger for the split.

34 posted on 11/01/2003 6:58:31 AM PST by Eala (FR Traditional Anglican Directory: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
Erastian? which bishop was that??? :-)

Seriously, except for the UK the British Crown has no direct influence on anything Anglican, other than having a say in who becomes Archbishop of Canterbury. Yeah, we all know the next remark already...which is why a great many people are working toward insuring that whatever develops in our movement toward an Anglican magisterium results in the actual power being vested in the Primates' Council.
35 posted on 11/01/2003 11:54:36 AM PST by ahadams2 (Anglicanism: the next reformation is beginning NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Eala; MissouriForBush
I found a new home in an APCK parish

Ignorance here: what is an APCK parish?

To both: I absolutely adored the Episcopal church - I got saved and filled with the Holy Spirit at age 6 or 7 in Sunday School through the beautiful, dedicated work of my young teacher (she was probably 18 and had a heart for souls like I've not since seen in that church).

I cannot here describe how that young woman's dedication that led me to Jesus spared my life over the years. It's a story for telling in heaven (and I WILL!). I was too young to understand much about the changes in the prayer book, etc., but I remember thinking at the time that it didn't feel right and I did not like it - and I'm not much of one to be led by my feelings on such cases. It was the way God used to stir me through the Holy Spirit, at that young age, that something not good was afoot.

Eventually, and while to this day I adore the way the Episcopalians give God the majesty and glory and AWESOMENESS due to Him in worship, and I love the communion service -- there is nothing like it in the other churches I've taken communion -- I had to leave. In His endless grace, God led me to a nondenominational church where I was refilled with the Holy Spirit in my early 20's.

If I were pastoring a church, I would want to blend elements of the charismatic worship and the majesty of the Episcopal, including using REAL WINE in communion. I asked the Lord why I felt such a deadness in nondenom's communion, compared with the extraordinary life I felt while taking Episcopal communion - He showed me that to take the fruit of the vine, kill it (pick it), crush it, and serve that, celebrates His death. But to put yeast* into it - a living thing - and ferment it, and serve it, brings the dead fruit of the vine alive again, and thereby allows the communicant to celebrate His death AND His resurrection. In any event, I have always felt extraordinarily close to God when taking Episcopal communion, and He used it to touch and preserve me through a very dark childhood.

Nondenominational churches can make God too familiar in many ways and it unbalances the flock, it inappropriately softens the reverential fear of God we are commanded Biblically to have. And yet the nondenom's bring God closer than the Episcopalians can ...

Obviously, we have not yet seen (anywhere!) the unspotted, unwrinkled, unblemished Church for which Jesus will return.

God is separating the sheep from the goats in this church.

*Yeast was not always referred to negatively in the Scriptures, since Jesus referred to the kingdom of heaven as yeast being inserted into dough, to raise it.

36 posted on 11/01/2003 1:19:28 PM PST by GretchenEE (Liberals CANNOT be trusted with national security [excepting maybe Congr. Norm Dicks].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: altura
Brideshead Revisited is indeed available on DVD. I checked it out from my library (more than once). Sorry I posted the spoiler!

The first time I saw it, I inadvertently skipped the "Orphans in the Storm" episode - I honestly think God blinded me to its existence, because on a later viewing, when I did watch it, I was grieved and had to skip over the unclothed adulterers coming together ... I'm sure some wouldn't object but I found it absolutely unnecessary and demeaning to the plot. You can skip that episode and still be able to follow the story line.

37 posted on 11/01/2003 1:24:09 PM PST by GretchenEE (Liberals CANNOT be trusted with national security [excepting maybe Congr. Norm Dicks].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GretchenEE
GretchenEE,

APCK is an acronym for The Anglican Province of Christ the King -- the APCK is one of the Continuing Churches, stemmed from ECUSA. If you attended my church you'd find the old familiar service (albeit a bit more "High Church" than the quite low-church service I grew up with, but to me more beautiful, awesome and worshipful -- and yet we also have Cursillitas in our ranks).

38 posted on 11/01/2003 8:07:45 PM PST by Eala (FR Traditional Anglican Directory: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
God has no need to judge a thing twice.

Reprising your wisdom.

39 posted on 11/04/2003 12:35:41 PM PST by GretchenEE (Liberals CANNOT be trusted with national security [excepting maybe Congr. Norm Dicks].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson