Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1
Her lawyer says it, it must be true.

His lawyer, plus eight witnesses, and 18 judges say it, well, it must be false.

And we've got a document (someplace, just can't find it right now) that proves it.

Afterall everyone already knows thats true.

Just a small example of the well-reasoned logic I've been seeing here in the past week or so.

54 posted on 10/28/2003 8:08:12 PM PST by Normally a Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Normally a Lurker
You do not have documentation that states that many people have examined Terri and determined she had bulemia. That is a an outright lie. Last night on LArry King MS himself said he had no proof of an eating disorder, because it was the nature of the disease, "no one knows". Get your facts straight before you claim anyone else is being illogical.
57 posted on 10/28/2003 8:12:45 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross ((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Normally a Lurker
Just a small example of the well-reasoned logic I've been seeing here in the past week or so.

Grow up .. I am just trying to understand the facts

Yes, I will readily admit I do not trust MS nor his lawyer .. because they have shown me no reason to

But I also know that her parents lawyer would not agree with MS claim either

Hence my questions if there was documentation of her bulemia

From what I can gather (so far) this was an assumption of doctors because of blood tests done the night she collasped .. but that also does not prove that she was bulemia

Plus they said she had a heat attack and later documents state that she has no heart damage

If a person has a heart attack .. the damage to the heart does not just go away

59 posted on 10/28/2003 8:28:16 PM PST by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Normally a Lurker
His lawyer, plus eight witnesses, and 18 judges say it, well, it must be false.

You are using the same thought processes as George Felos. 18 Judges, my ass. Get your facts straight. 17 Judges refusing to review does not mean the same as 18 judges agreeing. Eight witnesses, to what?

72 posted on 10/28/2003 10:29:51 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson