His lawyer, plus eight witnesses, and 18 judges say it, well, it must be false.
And we've got a document (someplace, just can't find it right now) that proves it.
Afterall everyone already knows thats true.
Just a small example of the well-reasoned logic I've been seeing here in the past week or so.
Grow up .. I am just trying to understand the facts
Yes, I will readily admit I do not trust MS nor his lawyer .. because they have shown me no reason to
But I also know that her parents lawyer would not agree with MS claim either
Hence my questions if there was documentation of her bulemia
From what I can gather (so far) this was an assumption of doctors because of blood tests done the night she collasped .. but that also does not prove that she was bulemia
Plus they said she had a heat attack and later documents state that she has no heart damage
If a person has a heart attack .. the damage to the heart does not just go away
You are using the same thought processes as George Felos. 18 Judges, my ass. Get your facts straight. 17 Judges refusing to review does not mean the same as 18 judges agreeing. Eight witnesses, to what?