Replies

Mostly, the internet publishers simply culled newspapers articles together that brought some forgotten angle to the forefront to be exposed to light.

It made for interesting reading anyway and provided a radical world view to keep the place lively.

There was even the case of some crazy guy, Leo Wanta who was saying the weirdest stuff in a Wisconsin courtroom that received national exposure on FR.

The conspiracy rantors came and went all the time but the community at large stayed together. While I appreciate your point of view--far more than you care for my crack-pot world view, right?-- if only because it's unique in its radical centrism, its not exactly the best point of view for a conservative libertarian website.

I don't understand your point re: "There's nothing un-libertarian about respecting property rights" in relation to my post. Poe suggested that he is not sure whether he is still a libertarian; my point is that his line does not make any sense if he is at the present time considering himself a libertarian.

I may have misunderstood So by exercising property rights on his own forum, he doesn't think he is a libertarian anymore? . I took you to mean that Poe had effectively abandoned libertarinism (and I don’t know if he’s a libertarian to begin with), by enforcing his right, as owner of the site, to control content.