Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnGalt
I don't understand your point re: "There's nothing un-libertarian about respecting property rights" in relation to my post. Poe suggested that he is not sure whether he is still a libertarian; my point is that his line does not make any sense if he is at the present time considering himself a libertarian.

I may have misunderstood So by exercising property rights on his own forum, he doesn't think he is a libertarian anymore? . I took you to mean that Poe had effectively abandoned libertarinism (and I don’t know if he’s a libertarian to begin with), by enforcing his right, as owner of the site, to control content.

113 posted on 10/27/2003 1:49:18 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
No, I took Poe to mean that he thought being a libertarian meant you cannot exercise property rights. I think he means to conjur the caricature of 'libertarian as a nudist dope smoker who doesn't want to pay any taxes.'
117 posted on 10/27/2003 1:54:56 PM PST by JohnGalt (Attention Pseudocons: Wilsonianrepublic.com is still available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson