Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theodore R.
You know I don't understand WHY this bill didn't remove Michael Schiavo from ALL authority over Terri and decisions regarding her health care. There is clearly a question as to his fraudulent actions and misuse of the Court Award. There is obviously several people involved in this case with glaring conflicts of interest. I trust that the Guardian Ad Litem will replace ANy decision making authority and remove all decision making from Michael
Schiavo!! This is truly bizarre, if this was just one week's reprieve. I am glad the AMA appears to be getting involved in this case. There seems to be many more Doctors with the opinion that she is NOT in a persistent vegetative state than there are on the other side. The sooner Michael Schiavo is "removed" from Terri and has his access to her either severely restricted or removed, the better. I don't think we can let our guard down yet. Not by a long shot.
71 posted on 10/24/2003 8:42:01 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Canadian Outrage
What's the deadline to get a new guardian, Monday?
128 posted on 10/24/2003 11:11:28 PM PDT by JustPiper (18 of 19 Hijackers had State issued Driver's License's !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Canadian Outrage
"You know I don't understand WHY this bill didn't remove Michael Schiavo from ALL authority over Terri and decisions regarding her health care. There is clearly a question as to his fraudulent actions and misuse of the Court Award. There is obviously several people involved in this case with glaring conflicts of interest."

That is what is so damnably frustrating about this whole thing, Lynn. I am amazed that given the facts swirling around this case and being sent to legislators, that some safeguard wasn't built in that would have restrained Schiavo, at least pending investigation, from having any control over the decision making process. And like you said, the conflicts of interest in this case are astounding.

I find it equally scary that the bill itself is being dragged through the courts. This is clearly a measure that safeguards an individual's most fundamental of CONSTITUTIONAL rights, the RIGHT TO LIFE, which is deemed inalienable, not only by the US Constitution, but by the Florida Constitution. They are trying to challenge it based on the "separation of powers" which is just as slippery and mythological a notion as their notion of "separation of church and state," (their meaning the libosociocommies and their agenda). What about "balance of powers?" The executive and legislative did its job when the judiciary went beyond the scope of its authority. It is what they are SUPPOSED to do, and I fail to understand why this is even an issue. The average 5-year old could grasp the simplicity of the concept, but then obviously, we're not talking about grasping concepts here; we're talking about redefining them.

392 posted on 10/27/2003 11:11:31 AM PST by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson