To: sweetliberty; JustPiper; All
I just had a thought on what M. Schiavo's motives could be. What would happen to the assets he and Terri had accumulated together prior to her collapse if she is allowed to remain alive and if guardianship was given to her parents? Would Michael have to divvy up all the assets (house, cars, etc.) sell them and give half the money to Terri's guardian?
Any attorneys on this site please feel free to weigh in on this!!
To: Conservatish
Good question. Terri's survival seems to be creating a major inconvenience for Michael on many fronts. Now I'm hearing that he doesn't intend to marry the live-in mistress because they're "happy the way they are." I'm not sure what thread I read that on. So, if that's true, why is she being called his fiance? Or could it be just the latest in the HINO's shapeshifting strategies under the watchful coaching of George (I wannabe a god) Felos?
1,739 posted on
10/28/2003 3:22:37 PM PST by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Conservatish
Yes 50/50 if she is alive. 100 if she's not. In a divorce, he'd gain zip, she has nothing, he has.
1,776 posted on
10/28/2003 4:06:39 PM PST by
JustPiper
(18 of 19 Hijackers had State issued Driver's License's !!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson