Skip to comments.
Michael Schiavo Larry King Live
CNN Live ^
| 10-24-03
| Larry King
Posted on 10/24/2003 7:05:19 PM PDT by JustPiper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,101-2,120, 2,121-2,140, 2,141-2,160, 2,161-2,174 next last
To: Theodore R.
"Gee, Dickens couldn't have written a novel with so many twists, turns, and mysteries." It is still my opinion that only Shakespeasre could have done this story justice.
2,121
posted on
10/30/2003 2:27:27 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Mo1
"who are paying the fees now?" Felos' publisher via rights granted by Schiavo?
2,122
posted on
10/30/2003 2:29:42 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Republic
"It is CARLA who needs to be interviewed." Yes, THAT is the interview I want to see too! Where IS this woman? Deep cover? Death threats? Just trying to keep a low profile? Fighting for Terri anonymously? If she had the nerve to step to the front lines publicly, she could make a huge difference in the court of public opinion, and I think at this point there is likely no news channel that could resist having her tell her story if she were willing. Does anybody know how to find her, email her, somehow make contact with her and beg her to do this?
2,123
posted on
10/30/2003 2:44:43 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: sweetliberty
I am yet to know for sure, sweetliberty, if Schaivo's appearance on Larry King was "abysmal" in the eyes of liberal Americans. Liberals may have agreed with nearly everything he said. We have not really heard what the public reaction to the appearance actually was.
I THINK that Schiavo "admitted" to having dehydrated and starved his aging parents to death, but there was no outrage about that, it seems!
To: sweetliberty
I am yet to know for sure, sweetliberty, if Schaivo's appearance on Larry King was "abysmal" in the eyes of liberal Americans. Liberals may have agreed with nearly everything he said. We have not really heard what the public reaction to the appearance actually was.
I THINK that Schiavo "admitted" to having dehydrated and starved his aging parents to death, but there was no outrage about that, it seems!
To: Theodore R.
but there was no outrage about that, it seems!
That reminds me of Bob Dole's 1996 campaign: he went around the country, asking, "Where's the outrage?" Alas, there was NONE.
To: valleygal
"if you watch Spongebob, the lawyer reminds me of Plankton" ROTFL! Not being too familiar with Spongebob, I'll leave it to you to work that angle. Graphics anyone?
2,127
posted on
10/30/2003 3:49:04 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Mo1; valleygal
See valleygal's post #1128 and my post #2127.
2,128
posted on
10/30/2003 3:51:02 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Graymatter
" A lot of women understand very well what sort of man it is that, when he comes home, you pretend to be asleep" Absolutely! I suspect he lost the women big time with that performance, even the ones who were on his side before.
2,129
posted on
10/30/2003 3:54:11 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Theodore R.
We may not know the reaction-we all tend to see what supports our own theory, but for sure it was a ratings bump for CNN , and for sure they got a lot of emails regarding this interview with not one but TWO vampires, because they have invited the Schindlers on next week.
and ya don't do THAT when your whole goal is ratings...which translates into $$$$$$.
To: sweetliberty
2,131
posted on
10/30/2003 5:05:53 PM PST
by
cyn
(http://www.terrisfight.org)
To: cyn
ROTFL! Thanks cyn.
2,132
posted on
10/30/2003 5:15:49 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: cyn; valleygal
Actually, that looks more like George Felos.
VG, see post #2131.
2,133
posted on
10/30/2003 5:16:47 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: oreolady
"Just about everything else hwe said was so DUMB!!!!!!" You raised a couple of issues that I too had thought about, but keep in mind that we cannot overestimate the IQ of the audience to which they are playing. That's why many of them have TV....to tell them what they think.
2,134
posted on
10/30/2003 5:40:46 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: blueriver
"The legislative and executuve branch came to the assistance of a family who's daughter was being executeed by the judiciary." I LIKE the way you put that.
Yes, I really AM this far behind. LOL! Work has a tendency to do that.
2,135
posted on
10/30/2003 5:53:30 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: StarFan
"I pray we get an opportunity to see MS on a witness stand." Preferably as the defendent in a criminal trial...not that I think it is ever going to happen.
2,136
posted on
10/30/2003 5:58:45 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: fiesti
"I am only aware of Judge Greer and Judge Lazarra??? who are the 20 judges" The only one who could see them was Felos....he has "special" powers you know. He called them forth from the hinterlands and they assured him that he was indeed "god" and had their permission to say so.
2,137
posted on
10/30/2003 6:09:20 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: sweetliberty
The Judge may have used the rules of evidence to direct to a prejudiced verdict where the findings of (prejudicial) fact are not reviewable.
2,138
posted on
10/30/2003 6:09:22 PM PST
by
bvw
To: kcvl
"(Attorney George Felos objected to WORLD's use of the word adultery. Is it so awful, he asked, "that a young man who lost his wife might seek comfort in the arms of another woman?") This is the same mentality which, when confronted with the behavior of the adulterous, perjurious philanderer-in-chief, sees it as "JUST about sex."
2,139
posted on
10/30/2003 6:56:34 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Normally a Lurker; PeyersPatches; Republic
"I'd sy you're at the mass hysteria level now" Actually, I was finding PP's remarks to you rather amusing. You made quite a point of trying to be disruptive on this thread, but for all your effort never rose above the annoyance level of a lone mosquito buzzing around a campsite.
I have yet to see you make a cogent argument or use facts to refute anything that has been said here. I've seen you make a few silly, unsubstantiated comments and take random aim at attacking other posters in a seeming ploy for attention. Why don't you tell us exactly what value that adds to this discussion. Or better yet, maybe you should take Republic's advice and return to your lurking status until you have something relevant to contribute.
2,140
posted on
10/30/2003 7:20:40 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,101-2,120, 2,121-2,140, 2,141-2,160, 2,161-2,174 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
