Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catspaw
Well, Paw, I'm neither a judge nor an attorney but I'm capable of independent thought. FR is not a court of law. We don't give testimony here, we don't get a jurors vote and we don't rule on the admissiblity of evidence.

We simply look at the facts as best we can and make judgements. My judgement is that a court ordering the starvation of a woman at the behest of a husband who has a new paramour with one bambino on base and one on deck is a travesty of justice.

Two of 5 specialists testified at the trial that Terri could be rehabilitated somewhat. Her wishes as regards feeding tubes is unclear. Three nurses who took care of the patient filed affidavits supporting the parents claims.

I'm not big into conspiracies. The facts are as I described them and while a criminal conviction requires evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, the starvation of a disabled woman seems merely to require dubious testimony from an estranged husband and 3 out 5 expert witnesses.

Something very wrong there Counselor.

72 posted on 10/23/2003 7:45:02 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
It looks like you're too emotionally involved to make a judgment.
73 posted on 10/23/2003 7:47:33 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson