LOL.
If you can't argue the facts, argue the law; if you can't argue the law, impugn the emotional stability of the other freeper? Is that how it goes?
I have to admit, its hard not to get emotionally overwrought about this. The first time I read about the husband prohibiting the family from visiting her, I was ready to get in my car and drive 22 1/2 hours to Florida just so I could spit in his eye.
Then I realized I didn't know what he looked like. I mean, if he wore glasses, it would have been a wasted trip . . .
I have a lot of sympathy for people who have been following this story from the beginning. If I recall, Terri's fight has been on FR for several years. The best of all possible conclusions would be for Terri to be rehabilitated and go home with her family, while Michael Schiavo stands trial for abuse.
----------------------
Please explain in detail exactly how that empty assertion works. Are you saying a person can not be emotionally involved at the conclusions of a judgement and this then reverts back into imcapacity to have made that judgement. How emotionally involved are you? I notice a string of posts here with you strenuously asserting your position. Does this debilitating emotional involvement apply only to other people?
It is precisely because people got emotionally involved in this case that Terri is still living today.
Passion is the great motivator.