Skip to comments.
Diana letter 'warned of car plot'( XXXX suspected of murder )
Daily Mirror / CNN ^
| 003/10/20
Posted on 10/20/2003 2:10:20 PM PDT by Truth666
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: You Dirty Rats
To: Petruchio
Diana ping!
To: Califelephant
Or the Queen's husband.
To: Truth666
Question.....
If you were a supporter of the Monarchy, a supporter of retaining the Christian heritage for Great Britain, and you wanted to prevent having the mother of the future King of England married to a Muslim..........would that make the possibility of a plot more "likely".
Personally, I believe that if Diana fell victim to a plot -- that this is a far more likely scenario than to make it possible for Silly Charles to remarry.....
Semper Fi
24
posted on
10/20/2003 2:54:13 PM PDT
by
river rat
(War works......It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
To: river rat
Makes sense
26
posted on
10/20/2003 3:00:14 PM PDT
by
Truth666
To: river rat
I believe that under current law only a Protestant can succeed to or hold the crown of Great Britain.
To: You Dirty Rats
I know who actually killed JFK, but for legal reasons I can't tell you who it is. So tell us the legal reasons.....
28
posted on
10/20/2003 3:02:59 PM PDT
by
Swanks
To: river rat
Having a new line for the throne of England (through Diane) was a definite threat to the monarchy. If Charles and his son and Hewitt's son got murdered together from an IRA bomb going off, Diane's line would have had some claim to the throne. I know, some will say that is too fantastic. We also have to consider the potential threat of a separate line in 100 years. These messy royalty things have a way of biting back forever.
I think Queen E. would have had trouble with a future King Mohammed of England.
29
posted on
10/20/2003 3:08:30 PM PDT
by
Chemnitz
(Support the poorest of the poor, the unborn.)
To: seamole
I remember reading somewhere shortly afterwards that she didn't have her seatbelt on in the first place.
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
"If Charles and his son and Hewitt's son got murdered together from an IRA bomb going off"
BTW, it's Hewitt's son that is now supposed to become King - William excluded categorically that in 2001.
31
posted on
10/20/2003 3:15:42 PM PDT
by
Truth666
To: Swanks
Sorry, but for legal reasons I can't tell you the legal reasons.
But I DO know who killed JFK. Trust me.
I promise to tell all in my first book: "It Takes Lying History". In addition to revealing who shot JFK, the book will also reveal who hired Craig Livingstone, who killed Vince Foster, who shot down TWA 800, and who killed Marilyn Monroe. (Hint: the same person was responsible for all of the above).
To: Truth666
Isn't XXXX an Austrailian beer?
33
posted on
10/20/2003 3:19:20 PM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Yeah, now it makes sense. Henry Paul drank too much XXXX that evening.
34
posted on
10/20/2003 3:20:54 PM PDT
by
Truth666
To: Truth666
You can tell how reliable this letter is when he supposedly had it for over 6 years and told no one. Now, just as he is trying to sell his NEW BOOK out comes the letter.
I wonder how long it took him to fake it up?
35
posted on
10/20/2003 3:22:21 PM PDT
by
protest1
To: protest1
He's a perfectionist - that's why he took so long.
36
posted on
10/20/2003 3:24:45 PM PDT
by
Truth666
To: You Dirty Rats
I promise to tell all in my first book: "It Takes Lying History". In addition to revealing who shot JFK, the book will also reveal who hired Craig Livingstone, who killed Vince Foster, who shot down TWA 800, and who killed Marilyn Monroe. (Hint: the same person was responsible for all of the above). We can't wait for the book. I'll head right to the Fiction secton at Barnes & Noble.
37
posted on
10/20/2003 3:26:03 PM PDT
by
Swanks
To: Truth666
So the papparazzi got all that blame for nothing.
38
posted on
10/20/2003 3:33:47 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: river rat
I more suspect the Queen's sense of being right regardless and being fiercely jealous of Diana's personality; not fitting in with the family well enough etc.
I actually wouldn't doubt a plot from the palace at all. Certainly Jodie's father is convinced of it. And he's had more money and access to check such leads out than any of the rest of us.
39
posted on
10/20/2003 3:38:59 PM PDT
by
Quix
(DEFEAT the lying, deceptive, satanic, commie, leftist, globalist oligarchy 1 friend, assoc at a time)
To: FITZ
At least no bad conscience - none of them was jailed.
40
posted on
10/20/2003 3:39:31 PM PDT
by
Truth666
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson