His right to reimbursal is NOT BEING INFRINGED ON! He must simply pursue his legal recourse. Good! His right to choose as he wants with his property IS! Bad! How is this not clear!?!?
Those that exist in fact you choose to ignore and those that exist in fantasy you choose to want to impose.
Again, I'm baffled. What exactly, do I wish to impose on anyone?
The only common denominator is selfishness...
I posit that you are selfish for bringing your annoyance into someone else's business.
The fact of the matter is this: were a tobacco company to produce a completely non-carcinogenic cigarette, you would still vote to forbid it's use in restaurants - simply becuase it annoys you.
Then help him by starting a legal fund after a smoking ban goes into effect. I know you won't.
VRWC: Those that exist in fact you choose to ignore and those that exist in fantasy you choose to want to impose. You:Again, I'm baffled. What exactly, do I wish to impose on anyone?
You want to require that an employee have to work in an evironment that is filled with smoke, while her counterpart in other businesses isn;t required to do the same.
VRWC:The only common denominator is selfishness... YOU:I posit that you are selfish for bringing your annoyance into someone else's business. The fact of the matter is this: were a tobacco company to produce a completely non-carcinogenic cigarette, you would still vote to forbid it's use in restaurants - simply becuase it annoys you
I told you, I would not vote for these bans even though I'm gratefull they are taking place.