Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
My argument is that he has the at least the SAME rights as every other worker. Your argument is that he has less rights than every other worker soley because of his chosen work.

And the rights of the business-owner? I have a suspicion you value those less than the employees. Interesting contradiction, if true.

381 posted on 10/20/2003 1:33:08 PM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies ]


To: Shryke
And the rights of the business-owner? I have a suspicion you value those less than the employees. Interesting contradiction, if true.

No, the business owner should be compensated for his loss. Therefore, we maintain the rights of the employee with the rights of the employer to enjoy his property fully. If the cost to society is too large to remiburse them accordingly then the bans should be reversed.

399 posted on 10/20/2003 1:52:24 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson