Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 101viking
More hyperbole. Buy a clue somewhere.

Cigarette smoke contains Carbon Monoxide and over 200 toxins that we KNOW of. Plus 40-odd carcinogens.

"Do you know what's really in cigarette smoke? How about 4,700 different chemical, including 200 known toxins and 40 known carcinogens (cancer causing substances). A few of these include formaldehyde, cyanide, carbon monoxide, ammonia, benzene, pyridine, cadmium, radon, lead, bismuth, and nitrogen oxides. Concentrations of some of these substances are increased in Second Hand Smoke; twice the amount of tars and nicotine, and three times the amount of carbon monoxide." - from asthma.about.com

There is no argument among the scientific or medical communities about the fact that smoking is a health hazard - at least not by anyone not on the payroll of a tobacco company.
163 posted on 10/20/2003 10:51:21 AM PDT by Steely Glint ("Communists are just Democrats in a big hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Steely Glint
"Do you know what's really in cigarette smoke? How about 4,700 different chemical, including 200 known toxins and 40 known carcinogens (cancer causing substances). A few of these include formaldehyde, cyanide, carbon monoxide, ammonia, benzene, pyridine, cadmium, radon, lead, bismuth, and nitrogen oxides.

Now

1) let's see them all so that we can refute them.

2) How many of these chemicals, in amounts large enough to do any harm, are in ETS?

We ain't talking about first hand smoking. We're talking about ETS.

172 posted on 10/20/2003 10:55:56 AM PDT by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: Steely Glint
Oh so it's hyperbole when someone else presents data compiled from studies carried out by the SAME organizations you cite? Interesting...if one is hyperbole why isn't the other?
174 posted on 10/20/2003 10:56:44 AM PDT by 101viking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: Steely Glint
Apparently you have left the thread. Unfortunate, despite your "get a clue" insults posted to others. You confirm my belief that the anti-smoker's position is strictly based on "annoyance", and therefore dishonest and socialist.
285 posted on 10/20/2003 12:14:48 PM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: Steely Glint
Concentrations of some of these substances are increased in Second Hand Smoke; twice the amount of tars and nicotine, and three times the amount of carbon monoxide." - from asthma.about.com

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Sounds more like it's from iamadoofus.com or letsmakeupstuff.com

315 posted on 10/20/2003 12:30:02 PM PDT by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson