Replies

No. I don't. It's pointless because they have been doing just that for the last 13 years and nothing has changed. I'm sure the courts and doctors know best in this case.

okay. I see you do not know the difference between rehabilitation therapy and maintenance care. When you understand the difference, let me know.

No. I don't. It's pointless because they have been doing just that for the last 13 years and nothing has changed. I'm sure the courts and doctors know best in this case.

She was never given any rehabilitative therapy . Michael Schiavo has provided only subsistence care for his wife.

Terri's parents have been trying to obtain guardianship and provide their daughter with rehabilitative therapy that medical professionals have said will allow her to improve significantly.

She never had a chance. Now that Michael and Jodi's 2nd child is on the way, Terri is only in the way. It is a crime to starve a dog, but it okay to starve Terri. This is awful!

i think there are several doctors that can attest to her ability to be rehabilitated somewhat. But according to what I've read 1. the husband will not allow any rehabilitation, and 2. any doctor who diagnoses her as more than 'brain dead' isn't welcome in the courts.

i work in a nursing care facility, and let me tell you, this girl is bright and vibrant. i've seen people in comas, braindead, tubefed, you name it. what i have NEVER seen is a husband so callous and disregarding of human life, especially his wife's life.

there is a woman who lives in the home who really reminds me of terri, her husband was just in a month ago and decorated her room with an anniversary banner, pictures and flowers to commemerate their anniversary. i have a newfound deep respect for this man. he truly LOVES her and i just don't see any kind of love in this case we are discussing. if terri's husband truly loved her he would be using the money appointed to her to get her the best care, rehabiliation and most importantly, RESPECT her parent's love for their daughter.

all i really see, cut and dried, is a greedy man who wants "the b*tch to die" as he said, so he can take what is left of the money and live guilt free with his new lady.

but that's just my opinion of course.

NAUTINURSE WROTE TO GEORGIA_JIMD: "So you [Georgia_JimD]are saying that Terri Schiavo did not deserve the opportunity for rehabilitation services. You can't argue that one to fruition."

GEORGIA_JIMD RESPONDED: "No. I don't. It's pointless because they have been doing just that for the last 13 years and nothing has changed. I'm sure the courts and doctors know best in this case."

I AM RESPONDING: "No, Georgia_JimD, GOD-Husband-Michael has spent NOTHING---NOT ONE DIME---on Terri's rehab, for which he was awarded $750,000. It was NOT awarded to pay for legal costs. His use of it constitutes MISAPPLICATION OF FIDUCIARY PROPERTY---A CRIME!!!

I AM ADDING: "Indeed, it is precisely BECAUSE he FRAUDULENTLY obtained and failed to use the $750,000 REHABILITATION award for Terri's REHABILITATION, that he has the legal costs!

I AM ADDING: "But for GOD-Husband-Michael's MISAPPLICATION OF FIDUCIARY PROPERTY, he would NOT have had ANY legal expenses.