Posted on 10/17/2003 2:03:11 PM PDT by mr_griz
AFTER ALL THE YEARS, ALL THE fighting, all the bitter recriminations, there were remarkably few tears on Oct. 15 when Terri Schiavo finally had her feeding tube removed. Maybe the crowd of 80 or so gathered outside the hospice facility in western Florida were too angry to cry, or too numb.
For her part, Carla Sauer was just too tired. "I've been pulling for Terri since 1995," she said as she sank uncertainly onto a three-legged stool to rest the sandal-clad feet she'd been standing on for five hours. "I still can't believe it's come to this."
"This," apparently, is the end of the line in the long fight to keep Ms. Schiavo alive. A Florida judge on Oct. 14 refused two final appeals from her parents, clearing the way for the removal of the feeding tube that's kept her alive for a half-dozen years. Without the tube, the 39-year-old will slowly starve to death. It should take about 14 days.
That's precisely the outcome her husband, Michael, has been pushing for. Claiming that Terri has been a vegetable since she collapsed after a heart attack in 1990, Mr. Schiavo says he is simply honoring a request made by his young bride: That he not allow doctors to prolong her life through artificial means.
Terri's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, doubt she ever made such a request. But even if she did, they argue that a feeding tube is not the same as artificial life support. Her vital organs function on their own, she smiles and laughs at the sound of her loved ones' voices, and she has no terminal illness that threatens her life. If she simply has someone who cares enough to feed her, she could live for another 50 yearsa condition not terribly different from that of thousands of other severely disabled persons.
"She's not a vegetable," Ms. Sauer insisted as she rested her tired feet. "She knows voices, she responds. She can follow commands, and she tries to communicate by blinking her eyelids 'yes' and 'no.'" And then there's the most important detail of all: "We used to feed her with a spoon, and she swallowed on her own."
That was seven years ago, when Ms. Sauer was a nurse at a rehab facility in Largo, Fla. At that time, Ms. Schiavo was getting physical therapy and full-time attention from skilled nurses. But the facility charged $4,000 a month, as Ms. Sauer recalls, and Mr. Schiavo soon chose to discontinue his wife's therapy and move her into the much cheaper hospice system. She's languished there for six years, tethered to a feeding tube while a fierce legal battle swirled around her.
The Schindlers argued that they should be named as Terri's guardians, in part because Mr. Schiavo now has a new girlfriend and a young child. Just because he's ready to move on with his life, they said, he should not be allowed to end Terri's. When a series of judges sided with Mr. Schiavo, the Schindlers appealed to the court of public opinion: They smuggled a video camera into their daughter's roomagainst a judge's ordersto show the world she could still laugh and smile and respond to affection.
With Terri now dying slowly, that video may be the Schindlers' final memory of their daughter. Rather than watching by her bedside, they are parked in a camper across the street. Bob Schindler has been charged with contempt of court, and he and his wife cannot visit their daughter without Mr. Schiavo's permissionor his lawyer.
The family tragedy, as painful as it is to watch, is only a part of a larger picture. Advocates for the disabled fear that Terri Schiavo's death could set a chilling precedent. "This is deplorable," Joni Eareckson Tada told WORLD in the midst of a whirlwind of press conferences and rallies. "What's happening here is just a part of a larger effort to class persons with severe cognitive disabilities as non-persons. Terri is not brain dead, she's not in a coma, she's not terminally ill. We have people who attend our weekend retreats who are more severely disabled. Yet the courts have washed their hands of this. Medical personnel are forbidden to deliver any food or water. She's being denied her right to humane treatment under state law.
"This case is a watershed for people with disabilities," Mrs. Tada said. "Removal of the feeding tube means you are promoting active euthanasia. As a quadriplegic woman, that's a frightening precedent."
If you and other prefer to believe all that has been represented by this family, then that is your absolute right to do so.
I do not. And furthermore am exercising my right to my opinion.
I am not defending the husband except to point out that the court has not removed his legal standing and has not acted on the accusations.
Could it be that they are not true?
I only pose that question as there is no press regarding a defense against these charges.
Unfortunately there will be many going there, not just Michael.
I deserve hell as well, as we all do. Jesus has paid the price for our sins, but those that deny him as their Lord and Savior will not be forgiven.
This event with Terri is an unbelievably atrocious thing...and it cries out for something to be done. We need Patrick Henry's, John Paul Jones, Nathan Hales, and Oliver Perrys of our day.
I saw some folks like that at Klamath Falls.
I believe it will take the same type of attitude and commitment to save Terri's life.
Best regards and God's best to you and yours.
Apparently the spouse has exceptional power in Florida, and Mr. Schiavo has exercised it as he saw fit, for motives pure or base. I could defend him, based on some unknowns. For me, nothing presented so far absolutely convicts him.
That's about it. I can't seem to find them credible in order to support overruling the court decisions in this matter.
I too await something that changes my mind. I can change it easily enough.
There's some of my stuff kinked on my Freeper Home Page and a lot more on my own home page
Best Fregards and may God guide you and yours in your every rightous and good desire...He will!
...and may He be with Terri, either to preserve and save her through His Arm (acting through mecial means or through couragous people who stand up for her), or by taking her home away from the evil that has beset her.
What did it for me is this...he's moved on, got a new woman and kids. He clearly does not have the commitment and care for Terri.
Her parents do.
It will not harm him in the least to let her live and allow the parents to care for her. She is obviously not comatose or a vegetable.
Common decency would indicate that such a person be put in the hands of those who will love her and care for her.
If he will not, it hurts not a whit to let her be loved and cared for by her parents.
That he will not do this speaks to alterior motives IMHO in the issue surrounding her care and her condition. I have come to believe that he is purely involved because of legal and financial benefit to him if she dies. That's what ended up doing it for me...plus the fact that it is so obvious from the reports and videos that this woman should live. She is not a canmdidate for turning off "life supprt" in the normal sense of the word.
Just my own opinion.
Thanks for trying to keep things rational. We need a lot more of that.
It tells me that this is a manipulated media war instituted by the girls family and that the evidence needed to justify the son in laws position is being withheld due to legal privacy concerns and lawyers advice.
Well put. I worked in a nursing home for 2 years as a physical therapist, close to 6 years in a university hospital. We're only hearing the parents' version of the story. The videos aren't convincing to me at all. There are a lot of holes in the parents' stories - in particular that Terri was denied therapy. Yet the story from this thread would certainly imply she was receiving it as late as 1996. The whole bit of "therapy denial" doesn't fit the smell test. The longer the patient has been vegetative, the less likely they are to benefit. Past the three-year mark, paying for therapists (when the so-called therapy is no more skilled than what could be provided by a family member) is throwing money down a rathole. I would like some of those screaming "starvation" to explain to me how pulling a feeding tube is different than pulling a breathing tube. One provides air, one provides food, both are "artificial
Claims like these:
Terris family later asserted that Michael Schiavo, who recently had a child with a longtime girlfriend he reportedly lives with, had been abusive to their daughter and that her original injuries were a result of a near-strangulation an assertion they made after experts reviewed her medical records.
Quite a serious charge, with no resolution either way.
A very valid point Jeff, and one that I cannot pretend to explain.
I wonder if the hatred expressed has some thing to do with his desire to proceed with this. I do not know if he is standing on principle, wants to win the case regardless or is truly doing what he believes is the right thing to do.
if view of the total lack of defense for his motives I have no idea.
I would definitely like to know, as it would make a difference to me.
I cannot just go with appearances. I have seen to much character assassination in recent years and have experienced it myself.
Perhaps that is why I try to keep an open mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.