To: wirestripper
Good points you raise, and I too, want to know more. I have a bias against Mr Schiavo based on little information.
Apparently the spouse has exceptional power in Florida, and Mr. Schiavo has exercised it as he saw fit, for motives pure or base. I could defend him, based on some unknowns. For me, nothing presented so far absolutely convicts him.
To: secretagent
I know a little bit about law enforcement in Florida, and they are pro's. It is hard for me to believe that in the span of thirteen years, that they could not have built a circumstantial case with these purported claims.
That's about it. I can't seem to find them credible in order to support overruling the court decisions in this matter.
I too await something that changes my mind. I can change it easily enough.
329 posted on
10/18/2003 9:17:38 AM PDT by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: secretagent
For me, nothing presented so far absolutely convicts him. So, because nothing you've seen "absolutely convicts" him, the death sentence must be carried out on her?
Your logic is cold, brutal, and... flawed.
350 posted on
10/18/2003 10:57:45 AM PDT by
Don Joe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson