Skip to comments.
Rush to Judgment [Lucianne's Singularly Thoughtful Column on Rush's Drug Problem]
Lucianne.com Short Cuts, October 13, 2003 ^
| October 13, 2003
| Lucianne Goldberg
Posted on 10/13/2003 1:27:21 PM PDT by paulklenk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: SassyMom
Roger that!!!!
21
posted on
10/13/2003 1:46:42 PM PDT
by
jos65
To: paulklenk
What a great article. Thanks for posting it.
22
posted on
10/13/2003 1:47:19 PM PDT
by
flutters
(God Bless The USA)
To: duckman
I saw a clown from the Enquirer last night with Geraldo on FNC.
The clown said, "More bad information is coming in the Enquirer," and he seemed very pleased with himself.
23
posted on
10/13/2003 1:49:20 PM PDT
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
To: Ready4Freddy
Get a grip dumbass,Rush has a serious back problem.
24
posted on
10/13/2003 1:49:32 PM PDT
by
jos65
To: duckman
Drug use and tales from old girl friends certainly ruined Elvis' reputation and earning power - NOT.
25
posted on
10/13/2003 1:55:41 PM PDT
by
dblshot
To: Sir Gawain
Only hours after the news broke, Katie Couric thought Rush Limbaugh's drug problem was funny. So funny as a matter of fact, that she made up a story about sitting next to him on the plane and asking for an aspirin - you get the rest. She told it with a baby-girl hair flip. It wasn't funny.
Any links to this?
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20031007.asp#6
To: Ready4Freddy
Those were in the day or so before he announced it.
I'd imagine Kewpie Couric will laugh just as hard if someone tells her a joke about colon cancer as well. {/sarcasm}
27
posted on
10/13/2003 1:59:48 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
To: paulklenk
Think what the Clinton years would have been like without Rush. None of that is diminished by his current problems. AAUUUUUUuuuuUUUUUuuggggHHHHHhhhhhh!!!!!
I can't even bear the thought.
Rush's friends will still be his friends when this is all over, and who cares about the rest?
28
posted on
10/13/2003 1:59:55 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: Allan
Bump
29
posted on
10/13/2003 2:01:19 PM PDT
by
Allan
To: paulklenk; YaYa123
Thanks, Paul. YaYa - I know you've seen this.
30
posted on
10/13/2003 2:01:55 PM PDT
by
SuzanneC
To: jos65
I really think after his gracious humility in his announcement last Friday they can't go far with the ridicule without a big backlash.
31
posted on
10/13/2003 2:02:28 PM PDT
by
GOP_Proud
(Those who preach tolerance seem to have the least for my views.)
To: Humidston
I saw some of that Geraldo piece, but didn't hear what you are quoting. But I fear all the feces hasn't hit the fan yet. I don't think Rush will be back in 30 days for a number of reasons. You don't reach the pitiful level of addiction that he has without piling up the skeletons in your closet.
To: paulklenk
bump.
33
posted on
10/13/2003 2:04:02 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(Free Tommy Chong!)
To: paulklenk
I've always found Lucianne to be a class act. This article just proved it for me. God bless you Rush, my good and faithful friend.
34
posted on
10/13/2003 2:06:41 PM PDT
by
Lucky2
(If I find out you're a liberal, please leave me the hell alone and crawl back into your hole.)
To: theDentist
Touche!
35
posted on
10/13/2003 2:20:16 PM PDT
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
To: Lucky2
I've always found Lucianne to be a class act.I have too. For any of us, even if just a few times in the past, who have looked forward to hearing Rush or having him pick us up during dark political times, Lucianne is exactly right when she says:
People, decent people, have hearts. They are loyal to their friends and steadfast in time of trouble. Our commitment should be standing by Rush Limbaugh. He has given us hope and help and a way of seeing the world.
36
posted on
10/13/2003 2:20:49 PM PDT
by
Dolphy
To: paulklenk
Since this is a Lucianne article, we must curb our tongues lest we be censored and booted off. (/sarcasm)
I have to agree with the poster that stated that if the situation were reversed and this was all about a Dem instead of Rush (especially if the Dem was Teddy Chappaquiddick, either of the Clintons, Daschle, Kerry, you get the picture) I might . . . MIGHT be less sympathetic.
By the grace of God I have never experienced the kind of pain that requires pain killers the like of OxyContin and others to which Rush was addicted. I have no way to understand what he or anyone in that situation goes through. I have stated previously that I don't know how I will react when Rush returns to the air. He is someone to whom I have looked up for years. He has helped me keep my moral compass centered and has guided me through the lies, manipulations and fabrications of the left.
I honor him for owning up to the problem and taking steps to address it once and for all. I wish he hadn't waited until someone else announced it and dropped the hammer on him.
I want to see Rush well, healthy and drug-free as much as the next person on this thread. I will listen to him when he comes back. However, I am still sorting through my feelings about the whole episode and don't know if he will have the same effect he once did.
The sick jokes are inevitable. They are geared to make us mad. If we let them make us mad, we will lose our focus and make big mistakes. Rush is getting what he needs right now, none of us can do anything about that. We can help him, however, by making sure that the leftists don't get a free ride in his absence. We can make sure that he knows that when he returns to the golden EIB mic that all of his words and all of the hours he has spent on the air weren't for naught. We can show him that we have learned the lessons and are ready to learn more.
To: over3Owithabrain
You didn't see that guy from the Enquirer looking waaaay down his nose at the camera as he hinted at "more to come?"
I watched his haughty facial expressions as he spoke and my skin began to crawl!
And I totally agree about the length of time we may be without Rush. Actually, he may even choose to retire. After all, why does he need all this crap when he could retire and walk away from people dissecting his every move and criticizing everything he says?
38
posted on
10/13/2003 2:27:00 PM PDT
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
Making light of JFK's or Rush's health problems or medication regimen or anyone else's real health problems lowers civility for everyone.Exactly. The media would like to make this be a; "Rush is a doper, nah nah, nah nah nah", story. But it's is not. It's about a failed medical procedure performed on a celebrity that the medical community did not want to take responsibility for its failure.
Were I a journalist, I would investigate the number of back surgeries in the US and their outcomes. I'll bet, truth be known, that what happened to Rush is more common than the FDA would care to admit. After all, they also approve medical procedures such as the "Lamenectomy", that was performed on Rush.
39
posted on
10/13/2003 2:27:54 PM PDT
by
elbucko
(Molon Labe)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Rush's friends will still be his friends when this is all over, and who cares about the rest?DITTO!
40
posted on
10/13/2003 2:30:57 PM PDT
by
elbucko
(Molon Labe)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson