I thought the pundits (Hannity, Hewitt ...) said that we should elect Schwartzenegger because the governor of California doesn't affect any REALLY IMPORTANT social issues??!!
1 posted on
10/13/2003 12:57:33 PM PDT by
kritikos
To: All
|
The page cannot be found
|
The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is unavailable. |
Please try the following:
- If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly.
- Open the www.freerepublic.com home page, and then look for links to the information you want.
- Click the Back button to try another link.
- Click Donate to help support the best site on the web. Face it, you don't want to sit down to start freeping someday, only to see...
HTTP 404 - File not found
|
2 posted on
10/13/2003 1:00:28 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: kritikos
Hate America. Attack America. Destroy America.
3 posted on
10/13/2003 1:05:06 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: kritikos
5 posted on
10/13/2003 2:30:02 PM PDT by
DoctorZIn
To: kritikos
If Davis didn't sign the bills, they would take effect anyway. CA has no "pocket veto."
6 posted on
10/13/2003 3:59:55 PM PDT by
heleny
To: kritikos
The Press, The Press, where is the press?
7 posted on
10/13/2003 4:22:15 PM PDT by
BIGZ
To: kritikos
In other words, Davis is setting up the Democrats for another future Conservative backlash down the road, assuming the Democrats haven't managed to gerrymander the opposition out of power permanently.
9 posted on
10/13/2003 9:13:42 PM PDT by
dr_who_2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson