Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear; FourPeas; Freeper 007; from occupied ga; ccmay; donmeaker; lepton; ...
Some interesting data:

Source...National Vital Statistics Report,Vol.50,No.15,September 16,2002 69

For the year 2000,

Total firearms deaths = 28663
Accidental firearms deaths = 776
Suicide = 16,586
(Suicide whites - 14,454, blacks - 1,090)
Deaths due to assault w/ firearm = 10,801
(Assault deaths whites - 4,806, blacks - 5,699)
Legal intervention (I assume these are "good shoots") = 270
Undetermined intent = 230

Thanks to those who replied to my skepticism. The 28,000 number is valid depending on how it was interpreted, but the suicide numbers (about 60 percent of the total deaths) is the remarkable part. Also the difference in races comparing suicides and homicides is striking.
117 posted on 10/13/2003 3:03:34 PM PDT by TN4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: TN4Liberty
There was a report in the Journal of the American Medical Association in August 2000 about the effect of the Brady Bill. About the only positive effect that was found was a reduction in suicide by firearms in men 50 - 60 years old, IIRC. However, the total suicide rate for that group remained the same, meaning they just found another way to commit suicide.

Another interesting fact was that in a recent year, maybe 2000, the weapon used to commit homicide was not a firearm about 43% of the time.

Thanks for the stats.
121 posted on 10/13/2003 4:11:17 PM PDT by neverdem (Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: TN4Liberty
Thx for the numbers
130 posted on 10/13/2003 4:36:52 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Am I Intelligent? Have you ever heard of Plato? Aristotle? Socrates? - - Morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: TN4Liberty
How fortuitous in timing. The gun grabbers validate my numbers here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1001182/posts

Notice how they consolidate their efforts with the NOW crowd and only write about women and children harmed by men. They deliberately ignore all the domestic violence initated by females, for which studies to document said violence is not politically correct to fund or publish.

Anyone serious about domestic violence will find it started by females most of the time. The men get the bad public relations because the men in defending themselves cause the female attackers to have worse injuries. IIRC, I read one study that stated about 90% of domestic violence was started by women.

When you think about it, how many men are willing to admit they we're physically assaulted by their wife or "significant other" and were too afraid to accuse the perpetrator, defend themselves or admit having their butt kicked by some virago.

Also, please return to comment# 23 on this thread where Brady embraces the socialist agenda.
157 posted on 10/14/2003 11:54:47 PM PDT by neverdem (Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson