It's so refreshing to read a MSM article with no bias.
Oh wait, I actually did not read the article. I stopped right there.
Let me repeat that for you: Claims of Native American heritage has no bearing in Warren’s appointment at Harvard or anywhere else. While there is no reason to doubt the veracity of the Globe’s reporting (and if you think dozens of lawyers would lie on the record to save a colleague’s reputation, you don’t know dozens of lawyers), many of Warren’s critics have pointed out that Harvard used her self-identified Native status to promote itself as diverse. This was clearly unwise, if not willfully dishonest, on the school’s part...
—
According to this idiot author, you can trust Harvard’s claim that Warren checking off the box she was Native American played no role in her hiring, even though Harvard is also dishonest.
The author also fails to dig into the more basic question as to why Warren would check off the box.
We knew this already.....
“Not because she doesn’t deserve it (she does), but because of her one glaring misstep...I’m talking, of course, about her claims of Native American ancestry”
It wasn’t a ‘misstep’, it is what LAUNCHED HER. Without it, she’d just be another whining bitch, like the ones that were seen crying on election night 2 years ago. That’s why she’s being held accountable.
But note how the Fake News types are saying it was just a ‘misstep’ - trying to downplay it, like forgetting to include a traffic ticket, when asked if she’d ever broken the law (and got caught).
Instead, it’s more like forgetting to include a digit when reporting income to the IRS, such as saying that you earned $126,075, when you really earned $1,260,758. That’s a similar ‘misstep’ - just one digit, but how do you think the IRS would treat it?
I stopped reading after the first sentence.
Elizabeth Warren would have made an excellent president.
DId she gain admission to school, receive preferences for being native american? If the answer is yes, she is dead in the water with a sinking canoe and no paddles.
Warren didn’t make a mistake.
She LIED to get a high paying job in the circus of academia and to drum up support as a ‘minority’ among self-loathing whites. She committed fraud. The university would be justified in suing her for it, and the Feds should be going after the university for lying on its minority hiring report - which it would if the university were remotely conservative.
The Boston G Lobe?
The Washington Post?
These liars are his SOURCES??
Ignorant ass.
The title should come with a cautionary note: Warning - Bullshit Alert!
Cliff’s Notes version: She won’t be president because she’s a hateful, screeching bitch and a liar.
A common trait of liberals is that they lie about their background (as well as everything else) - Warren, HRC, Obama, Cortez, Kerry, Blumenthal, Rather, Jennings, Lilian Hellman, Hemingway…
If you’re going to make “only” one mistake, don’t let it be lying about who you are. Like Fakeahontas or Occasional or the Obunghole.
Make that Katie “Brain Dead” Herzog
It's so refreshing to read a MSM article with no bias.
Oh wait, I actually did not read the article. I stopped right there.
Stopped reading there.
“Elizabeth Warren would have made an excellent president.”
I couldn’t stop laughing after the first sentence.
However, thanks for posting. It is important to know what the enemy is thinking.
That’s all very believable. Next, the Boston Globe can tell us that David Hogg got into Harvard based on his academic record.
Fauxcahontas got pwned by her pwn goal.
Katie must get paid by the word.
No she lied about her heratage for professional gain and continued to lie about it for decades after.... she didn’t make 1 “mistake”, she is a fraud, pure and simple.