Posted on 07/18/2017 8:11:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
She has also been seen and heard more by the public since the election... Her campaign plan of avoiding the public almost worked.
Did HuffPo ever consider the possiblilty that Clinton’s favorability poll numbers during the election cycle were a shame? That they were artificially high?
Her campaign was a Potemkin Village. There wasn’t anything behind the TV facade. That’s why she never visited Wisconsin and her campaign offices in certain Pennsylvania coal towns were closed 2 weeks before election day (I knew she would lose when I saw that).
Hillary is setting up her next move: Identifying as a man and running again.
People can say what they want about the more recent version of Kay Bailey Hutchison (before retiring), but earlier on in her Senate career, she was a decent conservative and in a very powerful position.
And she won re-election in Texas by HUGE margins. In Texas, where one would think our (male) fear of ‘strong, powerful, women’ would have kept her from anything beyond Dog Catcher.
But if the left wants to continue thinking that Hillary lost because she is a woman, that is JUST FINE with me.
1/2 of Ameriva’s Greatest Crime Couple, The Rancid Side of Beef. unpopular?
Deplorables can smell evil.
Translation:
Real person: "she lied a lot"
Gender Studies prof: "he's a sexist for caring about that"
The Huffington Post: Because she’s a woman.
There you go. No reading necessary.
I saw an article the other day saying that Hillary is now selling “Nasty Woman” T-shirts to raise money for Planned Parenthood. What a difference a year makes. This time last year, Hillary was getting ready to accept her party’s nomination for President at the Democrat Convention, confident that she would win the presidency in a landslide. Today, Donald J. Trump is the President of the United States, and Hillary is selling T-shirts.
Its simple. Once the media stopped their 24/7 PR campaign for her, people remembered why they hate her.
Why? Factor in a +/- 20 percent accuracy on all of these polls that’s why.
I’m surprised this is just an article and not a book with multiple volumes.
It was an intriguing and creative idea. What the two impeccably progressive professors expected to find, of course, was that if Hillary were a man, she would be embraced and loved; and that Trump, as a woman candidate, would be despised. Gender bias, proved.
Boy, were they surprised.
"The two NYU professors who designed the experiment were 'unsettled' to discover that audience members actually found Trump's style more endearing when it came from a woman," Athey wrote of the NYU "Her Opponent" project. "One female audience member even remarked that she found the male version of Clinton 'very punchable' because he smiled so much."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.