To: 2ndDivisionVet
From the article :
The crazy numbers are simply representative of which candidate’s supporters are responding to the polls more.
This entire scenario is just the latest example of why it’s not wise to call this contest over before it’s over. You’d think that after the third, fourth, or fifth crazy thing to happen in this election, the “experts” would get that.
I guess not. Should we take another poll?
2 posted on
10/13/2016 10:36:31 PM PDT by
heterosupremacist
( "Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
There’s another word I think of...
Rigged.
3 posted on
10/13/2016 10:39:20 PM PDT by
Paleo Pete
(Proud to be a redneck deplorable)
To: heterosupremacist
Add to that the number who refuse to admit to pollsters that they support Trump,
and the millions of newly registered Republicans nationwide,
and the hundreds-of-thousands of Democrats who are voting Trump, and you just might have something...
Trump ~ 65%
Clinton ~ 27%
Bank it.
5 posted on
10/13/2016 10:40:54 PM PDT by
Gargantua
("President Trump... nice ring to it..." ;^)
To: heterosupremacist
We never participate in polls or surveys at our house.
Anybody that wants information out of us has to work for it.
13 posted on
10/13/2016 11:12:34 PM PDT by
Califreak
(Vote for Batman!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson