Sure, it’s under oath, but you know her lawyers will be answering for her.
They are trying to avoid perjury under oath “in the least”.
Interrogatories work like this normally. Her lawyers would give her a copy of the questions and she would provide answers to the questions asked and return the answers to her lawyers.
They would then essentially “massage” the answers to put her in the most favorable light.
The real kicker to this is that her lawyers can “object” to questions and refuse to provide answers to particular ones. It would then be up to the Judge as to whether or not answers should be provided.
The Felon running for the Presidency can also claim to have no knowledge or insufficient information to form an answer.
There is plenty of room to tap dance through this process whereas in a deposition, objections can be made to a question, but it still must be answered and the Judge could later strike the answer, or the Judge could be called during the deposition to immediately rule on the legitimacy of question.
This is why the Felon prefers interrogatories if she is forced to come clean.