Well, it’s fair to say if the election were held today, Hillary cannot BOTH be tied and win in a landslide.
Therefore, some of the polls are inaccurate.
Unless we believe in quantum candidates and Hillary is both winning and losing until we stop the whole thing and hold a vote. Maybe that’s not so far fetched.
“Well, it’s fair to say if the election were held today, Hillary cannot BOTH be tied and win in a landslide.
Therefore, some of the polls are inaccurate.
Unless we believe in quantum candidates and Hillary is both winning and losing until we stop the whole thing and hold a vote. Maybe that’s not so far fetched.”
The little mentioned thing about the “margins of error” for polls is that the truth is that there’s only a probability (90%) that the results would fall within the margin of error.
Beyond that, and a much more likely source of problems, is the sampling methodology. If a poll samples a higher percentage of Dems, blacks and college educated people, Clinton will do better. Most likely that’s what happened with the poll showing her up by 13.