Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
This was not a definition, but an extension under Congress's power to make rules of naturalization (which, by definition, has nothing to do with Natural Born citizenship!) to treat children of overseas Americans "as if" they were natural born, IOW, a legal fiction, without actually being clear that they are well and truly natural born and eligible to be President.

To treat somebody as a NBC who isn't a NBC is unconstitutional. You think the Founders were actually doing that?

Congress can of course define rules of Naturalization. But they can't define new rules for being a NBC nor can the make laws to treat somebody like a NBC.

The most likely scenario for the language in the 1790 Act was that they were reiterating the common definition of what it means to be NBC.

289 posted on 01/12/2016 3:04:08 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
You think the Founders were actually doing that?

Well no, which should be self-evident in the post you just quoted.

291 posted on 01/12/2016 3:05:46 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign

Again, the 1790 act was overturned by the 1795 Act, which eliminated “natural born” status for children born overseas.


298 posted on 01/12/2016 3:14:11 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson