[Amntn]

It looks like it is a way to get around campaign finance law.

According to this link, the campaign released a lot of raw footage so that his pacs could use them for ads without having “official” contact with the Cruz campaign.

Looks pretty sleazy;

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ted-cruz-campaign-posted-hours-of-raw-awkward-ad-footage-on-youtube/

[usafa92]

But just remember, to many on here, Ted’s PACs are good PACs and everyone else’s PACs are bad PACs. And Ted’s money is good money because Ted is a true conservative and would never compromise his beliefs for his donors /s....

[Praxeologue]

It looks like it is a way to get around campaign finance law. According to this link, the campaign released a lot of raw footage so that his pacs could use them for ads without having “official” contact with the Cruz campaign. Looks pretty sleazy;

It took an anti-Cruz group to selectively edit the material and splice it together to paint Cruz in as bad a light as possible. As such, it is a hit piece. In putting all that uncut material on YouTube, in the public domain, Cruz demonstrated how candid and trusting he was being, unlike, as noted, the standard procedure used by other campaigns.

[AuntB]

“

It looks like it is a way to get around campaign finance law.

According to this link, the campaign released a lot of raw footage so that his pacs could use them for ads without having “official” contact with the Cruz campaign.

Looks pretty sleazy;

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ted-cruz-campaign-posted-hours-of-raw-awkward-ad-footage-on-youtube/ “

---

I have 3 email accounts that are FULL of Cruz propaganda this morning. The ONLY way his campaign is getting all these addresses is by some outfit asking you to vote your choice of president (often Nrcc and NRSC, who contributes to Cruz while selling bogus Trump gear to his supporters. Cruz has NOT been my choice, so his campaign is getting the addresses of TRUMP supporters to hound.

See: http://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3308620/posts?page=15#15