No, you are wrong. Romney lost because of the stupid 47% comment. Obama/Rats have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams in creating 50 million dependent on food stamps, 97 million working age adults without jobs, 50 million in poverty. Who do you think all those depending on handouts are going to vote for? A rich guy talking down the 47%?
Also Romney was a poor debater and got bamboozled by Candy+Barak in the debate. Have you forgotten?
Hillary has a much easier path to victory in 2016 with all those millions of dependent class.
You are dreaming, you are in fantasy-land, if you think Romney's performance in the debate swayed the typical American-voter-who-gives-a-damn. Have I forgotten? Why would a person interested in a politician dedicated to reducing government, care about how a government pushing functional Democrat performs in a debate? Very few American voters watch the debates. All they want is to vote for a politician who represents their general political philosophy, and in 2012, both the R and the D had virtually the same philosophy. A large number of Americans PERCEIVED that, so they stayed home. That, with the long-imbedded systemic vote ginning/fraud/manipulative tactics of the left, ensured the MINORITY leftist wins.
You fear something that is a wimp. The "dependent class" don't give a damn enough to vote, most of them!
Anyway, YOU can vote for Republicans who grow government if you want. When you get what you voted for -- Republicans pushing nationalized health care, the environmentalist agenda, gay marriage, etc. -- remember to take responsibility for it.
You're responsible for what you vote for.