Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

You say the 14th gives Congress no additional powers. I would direct you to read section 5:

“Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

Your main argument is asinine and not worth debating. I’m just pointing out that you couldn’t even get your preemptive arguments right...


49 posted on 03/22/2015 7:18:22 PM PDT by ziravan (Choose Sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: ziravan
You're right I should have said WRT citizenship. And it doesn't; even if you read its statement regarding citizenship -- All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. -- having or naturalized there means that this cannot be used to let congress define who is natural born, indeed it restricts the states from considering Dred Scott's reasoning that a slave cannot be a citizen [extending this, the not-citizens of the emancipated slaves] because they were property [and, of course, the product of two pieces of property could not somehow become a citizen by "accident of birth"].

So, again, no new powers were assigned to congress with respect to citizenship.

55 posted on 03/22/2015 7:29:25 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson