I really don’t blame you for not naming your candidate for 2016.
If you DO that, the few others here will jump all over you, claiming that your candidate did or thought something in the past that makes him or her liberal.
When your candidate doesn’t win the nomination, will you be all over anyone else who’s voting for the eventual republican candidate? Or will you just realize that the primary process has run its course and maybe......realize that the election will be between the nominees of the two primary parties?
Of course, the circular firing squad will have been in force for some time before that, with the same vocal few attacking all of the candidates for being way too liberal.
At least it keeps this place interesting, huh? Maybe that’s the real end game for some.
As far as candidates go for 2016, it's way too early to even begin selecting a candidate. Your motivation on trying to get me to commit to one is pretty obvious.
I will vote for a candidate that is pro-life, against amnesty, pro-2nd amendment, against socialized medicine, and for smaller government.
Any candidate that doesn't match those things has NO chance for my vote. I don't expect that the republicans will put anyone up that I can vote for.
/johnny