this is where the Romney haters really get off their talking points.
They hate Romney. After that, it gets cloudy.
Obama won in 2008 because Mitt Romney convinced conservatives to stay home and elect Obama because his “surrogates” attacked Sarah Palin, who was ahead at the time. OR, Obama won in 2008 because conservatives stayed home to watch Obama elected to teach the GOP a lesson, because John McCain wasn’t conservative enough, not noting the Romney “surrogates” attacking Sarah Palin. Then, Obama won in 2012 because Mitt Romney’s “surrogates” attacked Sarah Palin’s family four years prior OR they wanted to teach the GOP a lesson, no mention of any “surrogates”. Take your pick. The Romney haters here want all of you to believe that you’re all a bunch of dopes, being duped by Mitt Romney in 2008 when you didn’t even know it! It was really Mitt Romney who convinced all of you to stay home because you didn’t like John McCain. Are you that easily fooled? According to the Romney haters, you are.
The way to REALLY teach the country a lesson is to elect a far left liberal, according to the Romney haters here on the premiere conservative website.
Don’t ask their candidate for 2016, OR their candidate for 2008 or 2012. It gets them off their Romney hatred talking points.
If ONLY they expressed the same outrage at the actions of President Barack Hussein Obama......but then, they would no longer be victims.
Next in line, attacks on Jeb Bush, Rick Perry, Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum........isn’t that right, Romney haters?
Bulls eye! Laughing out loud really, really loud.....you summed it up extraordinarily well. : )
What planet do you live on?
Leftists elected Obama by casting votes, and indeed, if you want to get down to brass tacks, fake people tipped the balance to elect him via assorted vote ginning, manipulation, multiple, dead, harvested, and outright fraudulent votes.
Conservatives had no one, zero, zip, to elect.
In YOUR emotional, angry take, that translates as "to stay home and elect," a sophistry literally and figuratively. You are very confused, and so is your political thinking.
Looks about right to me. Bush, Perry, and certainly pro-minimum wage, pro government "compassion" Santorum, are very comfortable with the Democrat ground rules. Voting for any of them would be voting to strengthen the force of government.
My vote will go to a candidate whose entire reason for being, his whole purpose, is to REDUCE THE FORCE OF GOVERNMENT, starting with the Feds. If that candidate is in a party other than Republican or Democrat, he/she may not win, but my vote for him/her WILL reduce the voter mandate of the leftist who wins, Republican or Democrat.
Your vote, presuming it would go to a government-embracing Republican collectivist solely because it wasn't Hillary (or whoever the Dem nightmare is), would accomplish ONE THING, and one thing only: endorse a mandate for leftism.
Did you know you were on a Conservative website ? This ain’t www.IWorshipWillard.com.