Poll for Anti-RINO's:

[Vinylly]

If the election was held today, who would you rather see in office, Hitlery Clinton or a RINO? If you don't want a RINO in office who would it be?

[proudpapa]

How racist of you to suggest that there is an option other than Hillary.

[nascarnation]

I’ve said if it’s Hillary vs. NJFatboy I’m writing in Putin.

But I’m hoping it will be Lizzie Warren vs Scott Walker.

[cripplecreek]

We’ll be lucky if a federal judge doesn’t declare elections to be racist and appoint John Conyers.

[Lady Heron]

I am so sick of the GOP I am not voting for a rino. After that I just no longer care because there is no difference between a rino or Hillary.

[Flintlock]

WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT
DIFFERENCE
DOES
IT
MAKE??????

[cripplecreek]

If we get control of the senate we’ll be able to pin any president down if we need to.

[jsanders2001]

> How racist of you to suggest that there is an option other than Hillary.

Worded like the liberal polls to get the desired response no doubt...

[gorush]

That position will become less popular around here as election time approaches...but I’m of the same opinion.

[muir_redwoods]

I’m writing in Stalin. At least he was honest and to the right of either Hillary or Christie

[Pollster1]

How racist of you to suggest that there is an option other than Hillary.

Get the rhetoric right. For the past six years, any opposition to socialist progress toward full communism has been "racist" opposition to Obama's skin color. It's time to shift over. Now any opposition to a continued massive expansion of FedGov control over the minutia of our lives will be referred to as "sexist" because Hillary presents herself as female.

[HChampagne]

At least RINO voters do vote. Conservatives have better things to do.

[Zenjitsuman]

I want Tea Party backed Rand Paul, he just endorsed Mitch over Matt Bevin. Rand is evolving into a RINO and stabbing the Tea Party in the back to get GopE brownie points

[Daveinyork]

Depends on how fast you want the handbasket to travel.

[Thorliveshere]

Ted Cruz.

[lee martell]

No RINO’s please, at least not as President. We in the GOP have a deep bench this time. there could be numerous combinations.
Pres. Walker/ Vp. Cruz
Pres. Christie/ Vp. Pence
Pres. Jeb Bush (if @ the point of a gun) /R. Paul
Pres. Walker/ Vp Rubio
Pres. Christie Vp. Rubio
Pres. (That attractive female Gov. from North Carolina of Indian heritage. I can’t think of her name./Vp Paul Ryan

***I’m still upset at Christie for his Palling Around w/Obams at that critical moment, but just maybe this Bridgegate scandal will serve to warn him that his new DEM friends cannot be trusted. Maybe the Tea Party can re-train him to be or to at least act conservative. Same with Rubio. Both men made mistakes early in the Presidential Sweepstakes Game. There is still enough time to forgive (though we should not forget). Both men have been “on puninshment” status or pariah status with most conservatives for a while. The icy weather may be breaking. There may be a second act for both.

[erkelly]

Not with McConnell running the senate, we won’t.

[pallis]

I reject the choices. There are degrees of RINO, with a full blown RINO being a pro abortion, gun grabbing, amnesty loving, faggot promoting, big government growing, welfare pimp whose only appeal to certain Republican hawks would be his militarism and tax cutting schemes. Such a person has no true morality or good character, and there is little point in having one of them instead of Hillary. One lying sack of crap is about as good as another, and I don’t want anything to do with electing either one.

Now, having cleared that up, there are degrees of RINOs I might bite the bullet and vote for, such as one who won’t grab guns, and isn’t going to sign onto policies that promote or make me pay for abortions. He or she would have to have enough sense to hate Obamacare, and a determination to get rid of it. It wouldn’t hurt for that RINO to be pro cheap energy, and anti alternative energy scams. It would also be nice if such a RINO had enough sense to see through the global warming scam, but that is getting to be rarefied air among politicians.

The factors that would persuade me to vote for a limited RINO would be who is going to control Congress. That too gets to the conservative/RINO question. If conservative Republicans have control of both House and Senate, I would be far more likely to yield on my principles, and give them a less than stellar Republican in the White House, and convince myself it is for the good of the nation, and a move in the right direction.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

If the election was held today, who would you rather see in office, Hitlery Clinton or a RINO?

First, they need a new acronym - RINO indicates these Republican liberals are something unusual when in fact they are the Republican establishment, as firmly in charge as ever and as determined as ever to field Jeb Bush in 2016. True conservatives are the ones who are Republican in name only - there needs to be a new political party to represent conservatism, because the GOP establishment is far too busy competing for liberal votes.

Second, all that said - would the country be in better shape if we'd had a President McCain or a President Romney? Maybe there'd be fewer liberals in the lower branches of the federal judiciary and fewer noxious executive orders. But I can't take voting for the lesser of two evils anymore.

[Norm Lenhart]

I will not help empower a RINO. I will write in someone if no conservative option is on the ballot.

If that leads to the election of Clinton or another liberal, blame the GOP for running a RINO. I am under no ethical, moral or ‘American’ obligation to vote for them.