To: GunRunner
The point is made every time a Palin fan lobs another insult at someone simply for saying she wouldnt be a good candidate. It doesnt take a genius to see that she has a small, rabid following who are especially nasty and tolerate no criticism of her, no matter how small.
If I had to guess, I'd say you were a left-wing troll. You use the same deceptive approaches to your slanders.
For example:
Your whole post takes a small truth and then wraps it in several lies(distortion of the truth), and then you use that whole deceptive post to practice your projection.
This is the classic left-wing approach to using propaganda.
Your projection shows by trying to state that Palin fans are rabid, nasty, and tolerate no criticism, implying that it is their responses are emotional in nature, however, it is your response that is COMPLETELY emotional and is not based in facts, just your un-substantiated opinion and the evidence does not favor your opinion as anyone reading FreeRepublic can plainly see.
63 posted on
04/29/2014 10:03:28 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
If I had to guess, I'd say you were a left-wing troll. You use the same deceptive approaches to your slanders. I have an aversion to cults of personality, on either side. Conservatives should be passionate about philosophy and ideas, not media personalities and politicians.
There's a small subset of Freepers and the Tea Party who won't allow any criticism of Palin, constructive or otherwise, without insulting the messenger. If you can't see it, then you're a blind fool.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson