The guardrails are the constitution.
This is not your fathers "Cookbook"
Posted on 04/24/2013 5:21:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Tuesday equated the Tea Party to a non-violent “anarchist” group because, in his mind, Tea Partiers don’t believe in any form of government. He was speaking about the sequester and other financial issues on the Senate floor.
“We have a situation where this country has been driven by the Tea Party for the last number of years,” Reid said. “When I was in school, I studied government and I learned about the anarchists. Now, they were different than the Tea Party because they were violent. But they were anarchists because they did not believe in government in any level and they acknowledged it. The Tea Party kind of hides that.”(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
Interesting that he’s calling us non violent now. I wonder what brought that on?
Yeah,,, wanting to not spend more than we take in, thats freakin’ anarchy!
I wonder if he dribbles or drools while he spits out this crap. He knows that if he and the rest of the D.C.libtards keep repeating it over and over and over, a lot of morons will believe it. It’s such a shame to have a traitorous POS in his high position in the government. I am so ashamed of all of Washington . . . every corner of D.C. is garbage . . .
So Harry thinks we’re non-violent. Harry thinks a lot of crap that isn’t true.
Wrong, Hairy - just don’t believe in YOUR form of government.
Low information senator. Dumber than a box of rocks.
The Dems and their godless-secular-globalist-psuedo-utopian-keynesian-elitist-oligarchy buddies....
NOPE!!
once again, a Liberal is too stupid to understand the difference between no gov’t and a Constitutional gov’t.
draw a circle ... put a dot in the middle ...
instant photo of pinky.
Why Hairy, I am starting to think you are getting sweet on us. *blush*
You are getting closer to right Hairy. We don’t mind a Federal Government that stays within the Constitutional bounds.
Harry Reid must have sleeping in class when the teacher was explaining the turn-of-the-century anarchist movement. It advocated Marxian anarchism. The tea party movement attracts a diversity of ideological perspectives, but they are all diametrically opposed to anything Marxist.
if we didn’t believe in any government, how did we elct representatives tat blocked key democrat reforms they blamed us for?
his current lies are smashing into his pre-existing lies.
He studied his ass in college.
Operation Wall Street were avowed anarchists. Anarchists are leftists by definition.
Yeah, I was gonna say we talk about the Constitution quite a bit. Doesn’t he hear that?
then he needs to go back to school cuz he’s got it confused with his elbow here...
Hey Harry!
“Anarchy” is what you get when you have a president signing executive orders, an AG who won’t enforce the law, and a congress who sends up legislation nobody has read!
Harry POS Reid ALERT! Crapping in the swimming pool again, eh Harry?
The guardrails are the constitution.
This is not your fathers "Cookbook"
These democrats are thugs but also dopes. When the press let’s you get away with everything you just run your uneducated mouth and make a constant fool of yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.