Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Bid to Get Gingrich to Give Up Quest
The New York Times ^ | March 7, 2012 | Trip Gabriel and Michael D. Shear

Posted on 03/07/2012 9:22:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

MONTGOMERY, Ala. — For weeks, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich have been echoes of each other, both aiming their urgent verbal fire at Mitt Romney, the man they are desperate to stop from becoming the leader of the Republican Party.

But the political and geographical imperatives of two important Southern primaries next week are forcing the two men to turn on each other as they seek to demonstrate an ability to unite the party’s fickle conservative base.

It is a clash that has been building for weeks as both men circled each other warily, mindful that a shot at the White House was at stake. And it is a confrontation that Mr. Romney’s campaign welcomes — though it hopes neither candidate emerges as a threat.

On Wednesday, Mr. Santorum’s campaign and his allies turned gingerly to the urgent challenge: prodding Mr. Gingrich to abandon the race so that conservatives could unite behind Mr. Santorum’s candidacy against Mr. Romney. A top strategist for Mr. Santorum has been reaching out to a counterpart in the Gingrich campaign over the past three weeks to try to persuade Mr. Gingrich to withdraw for the good of the conservative movement.

Mr. Santorum said that anyone calling on Mr. Gingrich to withdraw was “not doing so with my knowledge.” But he made clear to reporters that he would not mind if it were to happen....

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: freeperheadsexplode; gingrich; newt; romney; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Pinkbell

I also wonder why the Newt supporters must continue to try to prop up their candidate by using demeaning names towards Rick like “Little Ricky”, “Sanctimonium”, “Saint Rick”, etc. I do not attack Newt because he is not the enemy. Newt supporters put much more effort on here into attacking Santorum than Romney.


Yes, why are Newt supporters so mean and nasty to us? To our candidate? I don’t have a problem with them not liking Santorum as much, and explaining why. But why all the mean spirited names and insults? I have criticized newt but also given him credit where it’s due.

The truth right now is that out there in the elections, where it counts, Santorum gets dang close to Romney where Romney wins. And just a small amount of newt’s votes would help santo beat Romney.


21 posted on 03/08/2012 12:34:49 AM PST by Yaelle (Santorum 2012 - we need a STEADY conservative President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle; RitaOK; ansel12
I also wonder why the Newt supporters must continue to try to prop up their candidate by using demeaning names towards Rick like “Little Ricky”, “Sanctimonium”, “Saint Rick”, etc. I do not attack Newt because he is not the enemy. Newt supporters put much more effort on here into attacking Santorum than Romney.

Yes, why are Newt supporters so mean and nasty to us? To our candidate? I don’t have a problem with them not liking Santorum as much, and explaining why. But why all the mean spirited names and insults? I have criticized newt but also given him credit where it’s due.

The truth right now is that out there in the elections, where it counts, Santorum gets dang close to Romney where Romney wins. And just a small amount of newt’s votes would help santo beat Romney.

Teradittos!

The attempts by some of the Newtbots to paint Santorum as a liberal are ludicrous. Sure, he endorsed Specter, who, as an incumbent, won the endorsement of other conservatives, but to my knowledge, he never bought into the global warming hoax, made a television commercial with Nancy Pelosi, or endorsed Dede Scozzafava, a "Republican" who is so far left as to make Dennis Kucinich look like Duncan Hunter.

And I, too am annoyed at the meanness and nastiness of some of the Newtbots. They remind me of the arrogant, know-it-all "Kennedy Liberals" that I so often encountered in the 1960's and 1970's.

22 posted on 03/08/2012 6:41:30 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Given the choice between Gingrich or Santorum it's no contest. Newt's the man. Santorum would probably lose to Obama.
23 posted on 03/08/2012 6:46:52 AM PST by McGruff (Sarah Palin: I voted for Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Newt is the only candidate who will tell you outright what he will do on day one to start restoring the constitutional republic. Mitt and Rick will need to study it. If you don’t have a plan to resolve the nation’s problems you should not be running for president.


24 posted on 03/08/2012 8:22:20 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

THANKS!!!! I love FR.....it’s like my personal encyclopedia and research staff!!!!


25 posted on 03/08/2012 8:31:43 AM PST by goodnesswins (2012..."We mutually pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
Sure, he endorsed Specter, who, as an incumbent, won the endorsement of other conservatives,

Did you look at that video, or transcript in post 14?

What other "conservatives" were trying to destroy the pro-life movement by supporting Specter for President?

26 posted on 03/08/2012 3:49:44 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
What other "conservatives" were trying to destroy the pro-life movement by supporting Specter for President?

I don't know. As far as I know, Specter never ran for president.

27 posted on 03/09/2012 10:27:29 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
Well if you continue to refuse to look at post 14, then you can keep lying to yourself.

"In 1996, I intend to win the other house — the White House — with ten commitments to America… including a woman’s right to choose.” "I pledge to lead the fight to strip the strident anti-choice language from the Republican National platform"

This is the video of Specter’s announcement and platform, Santorum is there on stage applauding his words in full endorsement of his 1996 campaign.

For a partial transcript, see post 14.

28 posted on 03/09/2012 12:20:39 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

29 posted on 03/09/2012 3:08:04 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Really? You think doing the same endorsement in a Congressional race that was made by our Congressional leadership, (Cantor, Boehner, etc) is the same as trying to make the Republican party pro-abortion?

Did you watch that video of what Santorum was supporting?


30 posted on 03/09/2012 3:31:04 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Santorum is not pro-abortion.


31 posted on 03/09/2012 4:16:29 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Then why was Satorum trying to make the Republican party pro-abortion in 1996?

Attorney Santorum is open about his having been pro-abortion until he entered politics.


32 posted on 03/09/2012 4:41:58 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Attorney Santorum is open about his having been pro-abortion until he entered politics.

And Gingrich was once a Rockefeller Republican.

33 posted on 03/09/2012 6:34:53 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

That is disputed, but Santorum endorsing a candidate to remove the pro-life movement from the GOP is not, and again, the scale, do you really so casually dismiss a platform to remove life from the GOP platform?

By the way, Santorum was anti-Reagan during his presidency, and called his supporters “fringe’.

Attorney Santorum admits this, “I was basically pro-choice all my life, until I ran for Congress”.


34 posted on 03/09/2012 7:06:18 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
That is disputed, but Santorum endorsing a candidate to remove the pro-life movement from the GOP is not, and again, the scale, do you really so casually dismiss a platform to remove life from the GOP platform?

By the way, Santorum was anti-Reagan during his presidency, and called his supporters “fringe’.

Attorney Santorum admits this, “I was basically pro-choice all my life, until I ran for Congress”.

While you're at it, why don't you bring up the fact that Santorums ancestors were Communists, that many of his Italian relatives are Communists and that his grandfather came from Riva di Garda, a hotbed of leftists?

35 posted on 03/09/2012 7:44:16 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Fox News:
I’m officially endorsing Newt Gingrich for President today
Jan 19, 2012 | Jim Robinson, Free Republic

I’m officially endorsing Newt Gingrich for president today. Was going to wait until after Florida, but see no reason to delay. We need Newt to win in South Carolina and Florida to stop any possible momentum building up for the establishment big government, statist, abortionist RINO!!

RomneyCare = ObamaCare = government tyranny!! Taxpayer funded abortion is as evil as evil can be!!

Newt is a pro-life Reagan Revolution conservative who led the Republican Revolution of the 90’s, taking the majority away from the democrats who had held it for 40 years. And as Speaker, cut the taxes, cut the government, cut the spending, cut the deficit, cut regulations, cut unemployment, brought the federal budget under control for four years running. And unlike Romney, actually blocked a socialist healthcare system from becoming law. And created a pro-growth, pro-free market, pro-jobs environment and extended the Reagan economy throughout the 90’s!! Newt is the ideal candidate to lead the Tea Party Revolution!!


36 posted on 03/09/2012 7:51:49 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson