Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Romney, Moderates See A Champion Against The "Nutjobs" The Tea Party is so 2009
BuzzFeed ^ | March 1, 2012 | McKay Coppins

Posted on 03/03/2012 9:25:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

ANN ARBOR, Michigan — As he watched last week's Republican debate from his apartment in University of Michigan's married student housing, Derek Osborne could hardly contain his disgust every time Rick Santorum came on TV.

"He represents a part of the Republican party that drives me absolutely crazy," he seethed.

Osborne, a Ph.D candidate, is a Mitt Romney supporter. He's also a moderate Republican who is alarmed at what he sees as the anti-intellectual fervor—and undeniable political power—of the Tea Party movement. As the latest candidate to emerge as the main populist rival to Romney, Santorum has become the primary political enemy of Osborne and millions of voters like him.

Indeed, more than anywhere else in this political moment, Romney's campaign stops have served as the stage for a rising counter-revolution against the Tea Party—with moderate Republicans uniting behind the candidate whose nomination, they hope, will damp down the fires that have raged on the right since 2009. It's the latest turn in an intramural war that has been waged since Barry Goldwater beat a handful of Establishment Republicans — including Michigan Governor George Romney — in the 1964 Republican primary.

"I will not vote for him if he's the nominee," Osborne pledged, as Santorum's face filled the television set in his living room. "For him there's one right answer that is given by God that you have to obey. You're not allowed to talk about negotiating or compromising. It's insane."

It's a sentiment that was echoed repeatedly by the crowds of supporters at Romney's recent campaign swing through Michigan.

Mark Mailloux, a Romney rally-goer from Fenton, MI who works in the health care field, called Santorum the latest star in a rotating cast of "conservative nutjobs... First it was Bachmann, then whats-his-face from Texas, and right on down the road."

His wife Joan agreed: "I don't want a nominee clear over by the Tea Party. I want a moderate, responsible Republican. Santorum tells us on television that he's got these big economic plans and then he doesn't tell us a darn thing about them," she said, complaining that he spends too much time attacking his opponents and sermonizing on social issues.

In Kalamazoo, MI, student Gus Thatcher voiced exasperation at conservatives' stubborn insistence on mobilizing behind a new standard-bearer every time Romney has defeated one of their candidates. He was particularly irked by Santorum's sudden re-emergence.

"It just sort of happened out of nowhere, and they can't even explain why they like him [more than Gingrich]," he said, adding that Santorum is "too extreme to beat Obama."

Though he has made occasional half-hearted appeals to the Tea Party, Romney himself has appeared to embrace his role as the party's moderate answer to right-wing populism. During a visit to Michigan's campaign headquarters on Tuesday, he let loose on his more conservative opponents.

“It’s very easy to excite the base with incendiary comments,” he told reporters. “We’ve seen throughout the campaign that if you’re willing to say really outrageous things that are accusatory and attacking President Obama that you’re going to jump up in the polls. You know, I’m not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am.”

This type of rhetoric is exactly what has earned him so many supporters in the GOP's waning moderate wing. But as the race has worn on, many of those same voters have grown restless with Romney's inability to seal the deal—and some wish he'd set his hair on fire to defeat Santorum.

"Why hasn't Mitt taken him out yet?" asked a frustrated Eric Zeugschmidt, a communications executive from Provo, Utah.

His advice to Romney?

"Take the kid gloves off and start knocking some heads... This Mr. Nice Guy who is taking the higher road is not working."


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: badloserromney; nastyromneyites; poorloserromney; romney; romney4romney; romneybackstabbders; romneydirtytricks; romneysaboteurs; santorum; spoilerromney; teaparty; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Mr Rogers

We are in an emergency situation here. A homosexual on the NJ Supreme Court? As they say where I live, “That should be your worst problem.”


41 posted on 03/04/2012 6:14:18 PM PST by firebrand (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

You seem to miss the point. If Romney governs like Obama, only slightly less so, then there is no reason to vote for him.

If he approached Supreme Court nominations the way Christie does, then he will nominate liberal activists to ‘get along’ with the Democrats in Congress - which is EXACTLY how he governed in Mass...

So why bother?


42 posted on 03/04/2012 6:50:12 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

So I guess people can’t take a stand for moral fabric and virtue anymore?


43 posted on 03/04/2012 6:57:39 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I didn’t say he would govern like Obama but less so. I don’t think you have been paying attention, either to what I said or to what Obama is doing.

Anyway, I detest Romney and am not trying to convince anyone to vote for him.


44 posted on 03/05/2012 1:13:23 AM PST by firebrand (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

It’s not really part of the tea party. That was the point. A limited point, I agree.

I guess I resented Santorum being called tea party and representative of the tea party by this numbskull. Shows he knows nothing about the issues.

If we insist on smaller government and the right to work, neither of which is a Santorum strong point, we could do all right. If we get into whether insurers have to provide free birth control we are toast. And that goes for any other distracting choir-boy issues as well.


45 posted on 03/05/2012 1:20:44 AM PST by firebrand (M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson