An.American.Expatriate: “That is normally called full disclosure.”
Fair enough, and I understand it’s better to disclose upfront any information that may otherwise discredit what one writes. Nevertheless, the article is either accurate or not, regardless of who wrote it. The author seems credible to me, especially since he defended Ron Paul on some issues and opposed him on others.
Personally? I don’t know whether or not Ron Paul hates Jews, but I vehemently disagree with his isolationist policies, to include his animosity for one of our allies, Israel. There’s plenty of ground between isolationism and world empire. I think it’s very unwise to believe the US can just sit back as the rest of the world erupts, because some problems will be far, far worse by the time they reach our doorstep.
Which is why disclosure is important as that information is necessary to determine credibility - and each of us must decide, for ourselves, how much faith we put into information ...
As to Paul's positions, most I disagree with ...