Posted on 04/04/2011 8:42:28 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
President Obama’s re-election bid announcement was pro forma. There was never any doubt whether he’d run again, and if the GOP has anything to do with it, the odds are looking better every day that he’ll win in a walk away. It didn’t start out that way, though.
The first year of his White House tenure, things looked shaky for re-election. There was double digit unemployment, home foreclosures soared, the GOP scored wins in key governor and senate races, the war without end in Afghanistan raged at a staggering cost.
There were hordes of livid, screaming Tea Party activists tromping around the Capital. There were defections of key administration staffers rising. And the carping, hectoring, and even fury from liberal Democrats and progressives of Obama at what they considered and his timid, cautious, conciliatory, even back slide on issues and polices rose to a higher pitch with each passing day.
The president’s precipitous slide in the polls and popularity came crashing to a head with “shellacking” the Democrats took in the November mid-terms.
But in the months since then the GOP came to the rescue. In rapid succession it has ticked off millions with its bellicose threat to meat ax spending on every vital government program around and if it didn’t get the cuts it wanted shut down government.
Its parade of would be presidential candidates sounded more bizarre, contradictory, and downright goofy on everything from spouting the phony Birther line about Obama’s birth certificate to flailing away with inconsistent, and confused statements about Libya.
Polls have consistently shown that even while Obama’s popularity has edged down mostly over the handling of the economy, more Americans than not said they were disenchanted, even fed up with the Tea Party’s antics, bluster and intransigence. Even if House Republicans pull back from making the colossally stupid mistake of padlocking government for a few days to get the budget slashes they want and the likelihood is they will, they have gone even further to imprint in the public mind that the GOP is the party of pig-headed, nay-saying, whining, intransigence.
Then there’s Sarah Palin. She has gone from at best a political curiosity to a downright embarrassment. Her popularity poll numbers, never anything to write home about even in her best days, are hurtling toward single digit numbers. Even she’s had enough sense to stop the hint, no tease, mostly for the media, that she’s a serious contender for the GOP presidential nomination. But Palin almost rises to the stature of Lincoln and FDR when compared to the clownishness of real estate mogul Donald Trump, Minnesota congresswoman Michelle Bachman and African-American businessman Herman Cain.
Both have made themselves and worse the GOP into even bigger laughingstocks by conning the press and the party into thinking that they have a clue about politics and the presidency. Trump especially has worked the con to a tee with his high profile media appearances slamming Obama’s birth certificate and offering a few canned soup bromides about his plan for America. Bachman has gone to prodigious lengths to try and top herself in seeing how many Tea Party and media grabbing odd ball quips she can make about whatever comes in her head. Cain just by being black, and getting some paper cheers from Tea Party leaders, has managed to keep himself in the media limelight for a minute. The three of them send chills up the spine of GOP mainstream leaders at the sight of them gabbing away on talk shows while wearing the tag of the GOP.
Meanwhile, former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty, Indiana governor Mitch Daniels, Mississippi governor Haley Barbour, and former Utah governor Jon Huntsman have been repeatedly mentioned as GOP presidential challengers. Not one of them has a prayer. In major polls since January, none has cracked the 40 percent mark against Obama. Two real possibilities to make a race against Obama competitive: Mitt Romney and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee are playing it cautious, and close to the vest. They are watching the political winds, hoping for a fatal mistake by Obama, and banking that their political credibility and name identification will be enough to propel them to the GOP nomination. That won’t be nearly enough to beat a sitting president.
In the past century, only one sitting Democratic president has lost his re-election bid. That was Jimmy Carter in 1980. And even the one Democratic president who suffered a massive defection and split within his party, a troubled economy, and voter fatigue at the Democrats for holding office for a seeming eternity, he still steam-rolled his Republican challenger. That Democrat was, of course, Harry Truman in 1948.Overall, only nine sitting presidents in American political history have been defeated.
Just think of the GOP names that immediately come to mind when the 2012 presidential campaign is mentioned, Trump, Cain, Palin, Bachman, Newt Gingrich, Pawlenty and then think this. The GOP makes Obama’s re-election easier by the day.
The author
I never said they weren’t. They re all vastly superior to the idiot we have in there now. I am saying that the crop he lists (and he didn’t have Romney in there but let’s toss him in there too) will not win. We need better candidates. That list will not get it done.
“You’ve never heard of Earl Ofari Hutchison before?”
No, this is the first time I’ve ever heard of the guy. I don’t watch TV.
If you’ll recall, that’s what they said about Ronald Reagan in 1979, Bill Clinton in 1991, Dubya in 1999 and Nixon in 1967.
I have actively contributed and proselytized for the conservative Republican cause and, frankly, I am ready to give up.
It is becoming apparent that elected Republicans are, by nature, content to be the hand maidens of big government and the last thing they want is a fuss over anything. They are hard wired to be milque toast.
If you could transport yourself back in time to 1980 you would see that Carter’s inner circle and the MSM was rooting for Reagan to win the Republican nomination. According to them Carter had it in the bag if the Republicans nominated that kooky Reagan. Hmmmm.
Let the Beltway media sell it otherwise all they want but this next election is about Obama and not the Republican candidate. Try as they might to make it about the Republican, and Lord knows the Republican candidate will be dragged through the mud by the MSM, this time around His Holy Zeroness has a record to run on and it ain’t pretty from soup to nuts. I am betting that whatever they come up with the slime the Republican candidate it will not out do Obamacare, a crappy Economy (no matter how much the MSM tells us it is great), Tzars, Regulations, Cap and Trade, and a complete loss of the trust of the American People.
Make that 1979.
Yeah, but on the other hand today's electorate is a lot more ill-informed than the electorates of 1944 & '48. A lot less common-sense, too.
The cabal that gave us the ride to the new world order from Bush1 to Obama also controls the media. I am hoping somehow the citizens (have to pass on the illegals) will wake up to the scam going on.
The cabal that gave us the ride to the new world order from Bush1 to Obama also controls the media. I am hoping somehow the citizens (have to pass on the illegals) will wake up to the scam going on.
Another Obama zombie, 95% of blacks voted for Obozo, Earl is just one of them, yawn.....
Ronald Reagan in 1979 - nobody on the GOP list is anywhere near Reagan
Bill Clinton in 1991 - if they were going up against George HW Bush then they might win
Dubya in 1999 - See above and substitute Algore
Nixon in 1967 - See above and substitute Humphrey.
The US is filled with idiots who still want to believe this guy is a centrist. We don’t have a charismatic candidate (on that list) that is worth a crap. Now, if Daniels or Christie run I’ll sing a different tune.
“I agree with your assessment. I sure didn’t nominate McCain last time though. The media helped him get nominated. You watch this time, the media will be behind Romney.”
A lot of republicans did cross over and vote in dem primaries though, which inadvertently led to McCain’s nomination. Early on, these voters were just hoping to finally get rid of the Clintons. Obama got huge republican cross-over. Later, some voted for Hillary just to keep the primaries going.
Meanwhile, who was left to actually vote in the republican primaries? People who didn’t care about scoring points against Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. Moderates. And these are the people who picked John McCain.
This time, hopefully, Republicans will have the sense to vote for their own candidates (since Obama is unlikely to have serious intra-party competition). Because, we need to be mindfully, many dems will be voting in our primaries this time around, and every vote will be needed to avoid them selecting the candidates they want to run against.
Well stated. I would also point out that many people were disusted with having McCain as the nominee and they just stayed home on electiion day. I held my nose and voted for Palin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.